October 25, 2021 

Gold Enters Major Bull Market


Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50 | Page 51 | Page 52 | Page 53 | Page 54 | Page 55 | Page 56 | Page 57 | Page 58 | Page 59 | Page 60 | Page 61 | Page 62 | Page 63 | Page 64 | Page 65 ]

 By bluejay

06/02/2006  9:47AM

Currently, there is an anomaly between some of the major gold producing stocks and the price of gold. Gold is off 10.30 at 633.20 while some of the major gold stocks are showing healthy gains.

The four stocks that are exhibiting unusual strength today are:

Agnico Eagle Mines - AEM-NYSE
Meridian Gold - MDG-NYSE
Newmont Mining - NEM-NYSE
Randgold Resources - GOLD-OTC

What does the firmness in these stocks mean as opposed to gold being off over 10 dollars?

Usually, this type of contrary buying in the gold stocks means a bottom has either been made or is near. In overnight trading gold hit about 618.50 which is in the general vicinity of major support at the 620 level.

Gold continues to be confined within a declining trend channel area of between 645 and 595. If the 620 level holds the metal will break to the upside within 10 trading days and shoot for 682.
 By bluejay

06/01/2006  8:32PM

"You have to choose between tusting to the natural stability(enduring value) of gold.. and the honesty and intelligence of the members of the government. And with due respect to these gentlemen, I advise you to vote for gold."

George Bernard Shaw
 By bluejay

05/23/2006  11:49AM

Two comments from Jim Sinclair today:

1- "The volatility coming in gold is going to make history."

2-- "My estimate of $1,650 being the high in gold is probably wrong. It will be higher."
 By Michael Miller

05/22/2006  1:55PM

Just introduced myself to Dr. Peter Morici, author of an article in yesterday’s Sacramento Bee. He deserves compliments for bringing some fresh views into the gold market, views worth pondering. We will get his article under NEWS soon for you to evaluate.

Whether his words express facts or assumptions is less important in the overall theme: the Gold Standard. As a gold producer, I am usually an opponent of the gold standard. As one concerned with the future of America’s well being, I think it may have merit, at least talking about and refining with today’s economic realities. Dr. Morici writes: 1. Jewelry and industrial applications absorb 85% of new supply. 2. The big new players are exchange-traded funds. 3. Presidents Carter and Reagan put the American economy on the path of deregulation…..and made the dollar a better and more stable store of value than gold. 4. A dollar overvalued…has created huge U.S. trade deficits. China purchases more than $200 billion in foreign securities a year. 5. With so much of what the world consumes now coming from China and other Asian economies, the dollar will be worth a lot less to gold miners in South Africa or Russia.

Dr. Morici had never heard of America’s longest lasting and oldest U.S. gold company, which does not surprise me. He should, though, because following our history, our struggles and out potential is relevant. Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. has never lost its vision or ability to mine gold. At today’s prices or more, our success will be measured in share appreciation, gold dividends and the intangible so important to some, good will. When I first took accounting at UCSB in 1960, good will was an asset on the balance sheets to reckon with. I do not see it anymore. Why, when and how did it disappear?
 By bluejay

05/18/2006  4:56PM

Reading ignoramus statements from the press concerning gold's health is really disheartening for the reason that some readers are ignorant and don't know the difference but desire to be correctly informed and thus get educated.

The following, "It's a dangerous market because the fundamentals mean nothing" is plainly not a sensible statement from a writer at AP Business to make when their readers expect more.

The sad truth is that the writer doesn't possess enough of a perspective concerning gold's fundamentals to be writing about it. If the writer did, then the writer would have never made such an irresponsible comment.

All of the real fundamentals and how they apply to gold are objectively reported daily for no charge at http://www.jsmineset.com by Mr. James Sinclair with guest articles from two professional market men, Mr. Dan Norcini and Mr. Monty Guild.

You should really go to the site tonight as there is an enlightening story concerning the Bank of England(the guys who sold most of their country's gold under $300 an ounce) and why they are orchestrating gold sales currently to help save the London Metals Exchange.
 By Michael Miller

05/18/2006  7:26AM

Thought I would take a few minutes to comment on an AP Business article published Monday May 15, 2006 from New York and in the Sacramento Bee, sent to me by a shareholder. Madlen Read, writer, puts forth the following.

1. “Gold’s latest rise is the result of fear.”
2. “It’s a dangerous market because the fundamentals mean nothing.”
3. “Demand for gold has grown faster than supply.”
4. “Physical gold is an option. It’s not, however, the most practical vehicle for most people. There are costs to store and insure gold bullion, so it’s really only a good idea for those with a lot of money to invest.”
Madlen, please do some critical thinking instead of repeating decade old opinions grounded in ignorance. You as well as most business journalists are well behind the curve of understanding how gold behaves and why. Most people, including myself, are very cautious when commenting about the under belly of the gold market. Its mystic has continued for 6000 years. Some opinions are just not true.

Fear is not driving the rapid increase in price. Fundamentals are as important to understand, as are technical facts. Econ. 1A or 101 teach the basics of the relationship of supply and demand on prices, nothing newsworthy here. It costs nothing to store gold. It does not need to be insured because you can bury $25,000 worth or more in you indoor plants. It will be safe from fire or other accidental occurrences. If you do not brag about your stash, no one will steal it, which is one reason some people, companies or groups own gold. It is the most private and liquid asset in the world.
 By bluejay

05/11/2006  2:29PM

This is the final word for the time being:

The following are statements made by Mr. Jim Sinclair today on his website at http://www.jsmineset.com:

"Forget the why. The gold price is doing what it is not because of fundamentals, technicals or geopolitics. The price of gold is acting the way it is because the market wants 1650 and will do it when it wants, not when some advisors tell it to.

Reactions when they come will be more spectacular than the rise."

Mr. Sinclair's advice is to buy into reactions.
 By bluejay

05/10/2006  10:44PM

A news report by MarketWatch could explain the reason for gold's strength recently.

"Moves by Venezuela and Bolivia to nationalize their countries' natural resources could soon spill into the mining sector, likely boasting prices for metals that are already at multi-year or record highs, while pressuring companies with interests in Latin America."

Value View Gold Report says "A great leftwing, socialist rising is occurring in Latin America, which will push higher all mineral prices."

Ned Schmidt goes on to say, Venezuela and Bolivia are only the beginning."

Indeed, early this month, Bolivian President Evo Morales said the move to nationalize the country's hydrocarbons sector was just the beginning. "Tomorrow it will be the mines, the forest resources and the land", he said.

"The greater concern is potential spillover to Peru" which is a major producer of gold and copper, said John Hill of Citigroup. Peru produced 207.8 metric tons of gold in 2005 or 8.2% of the world output.

The full story entitled "Gold markets eye Latin American moves" is available currently at Kitco.com
 By bluejay

05/10/2006  6:46PM

In January of 2004 the U.S. dollar was about where it closed at today, .84 on the Index. In January of 2004 gold was at $400 an ounce. Today's close in gold is over 75% higher than it was in 2004.
 By bluejay

05/10/2006  2:11PM

The last on gold is $708.10.

The price of gold is indicating that there is a serious problem that may be getting ready to surface.

The problem with the U.S. dollar is old news. Is the Iranian situation on the verge of exploding? Will there be company failures for those who have heavily shorted gold bullion. Has the FED been involved in selling gold and has it turned against them? Do we really have all the gold in Fort Knox and in federal reserve banks that they say we do? Something is wrong.

Gold is doing in days what it should have been doing in months, maybe weeks.

Gold has unexpectedly vaulted past big resistance at 682. Unfortunately, you can throw the charts out the window for the time being. Gold is a real animal now, growing stronger as it moves higher.
 By bluejay

05/10/2006  8:50AM

The deepest gold mine in the world is the Tau Tona owned by AngloGold Ashanti in South Africa. The mine workings extend 2.3 miles below surface.
 By bluejay

05/06/2006  2:01PM

Another surprise, this time from Berkshire Hathaway.

Warren Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting that he didn't make any money on his silver investment because he "bought it very early" and said "he sold it very early. Other than that, everything I did was perfect."

In 1998 Warren Buffett bought for Berkshire 129 million ounces of silver. The price paid was over $500 million and probably cost him about $3.90 an ounce.

Silver closed Friday at $13.90.
That's $10 an ounce profit not realized. $10 times 129 million ounces of potential silver profit would have been $1,290,000,000.00. Now, that's a real big mistake.
 By bluejay

05/04/2006  11:18AM

Barrick Gold made a surprise announcement with their first quarter earnings report filed yesterday.

Barrick stated that their corporate gold sales contract positions(forward gold sales) have been reduced by a shocking 4.7 million ounces. As of 5-03-06 a total of 5.7 million ounces of forward gold sold have been squared away.

Barrick intends to reduce their hedged forward gold position by another 2.0 million ounces by year's end. Barrick further stated that by the end of 2009 they will have eliminated their entire gold hedge program.

Barrick in the past has been accused of contributing to gold's long bear market with their excessive forward gold sales. Gold ultimately bottomed out at just above $250 an ounce some years back.

An appropriate question is, why did these gold companies cover their gold hedge programs so late. I guess they don't read our Forum pages.

Some years ago Mr. James Sinclair of http://www.jsmineset.com took out full page adds for all gold companies to read in mining trade paper's and in Barron's that gold was heading up and that gold hedge programs should be terminated.

Do you remember the story that, "you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink"?

One only has to wonder why it took these guys so long to cover?

Included in Barricks buy back were the gold short positions incurred by Placer Dome which they recently acquired.

Placer's loss for their share of the past forward gold sales in the quarter was $1.2 billion and in the time following the first quarter was $814 million. That's a staggering $2 billion plus in losses for the Placer position alone.

Does anyone remember that some of the seed money to get American Barrick originally started came from Saudi Arabia?

Does anyone remember that George Bush senior was a board director at Barrick?

American Barrick was put in place to control the price of gold. It is obvious by their throwing in the towel that there is no stopping gold now.
 By bluejay

04/19/2006  12:19PM

Last on gold is $640. I know we're in a bull market and I know it is healthy to react but this current move is very very impressive.
 By Rae Bell

04/19/2006  7:56AM

How about that gold price? The london fix is $624.75 today!
 By bluejay

04/16/2006  9:54PM

New Delhi, April 16, 2006
Press Trust of India reports from Assocham's Paper on "Yellow Metal: its Future Pricing Trends" that

"gold demand world over had reached at around 4,000 tonnes per annum against its supplies which remained stagnant at about 2,250 tonnes per annum."
 By bluejay

04/10/2006  3:02PM

The last on gold is $599.60 after hitting $600.70 in the after hours trading market. The current trading range on gold is about $530 to about $610. The probabilities favor gold moving slightly higher followed by a selloff. This is all normal and to be expected.

Supporting gold's recent strength has been the run-up in the price of silver. The last on silver is $12.72. Seven months ago silver was under $7.50 an ounce. Silver still possesses the ability to trade near $14 an ounce on a short term basis.

Most importantly for the gold and silver stocks is the fact that the Philadelphia Gold & Silver Mining Index is suffocating its shares at the 150 level on the chart. These stocks are weak and are currently laboring for strength just under this level. In the past 20 years the 150 area on the chart has ended all intermediate uptrends as they approached and traded partially through.

As gold, silver and their related shares appear temporarily inflated, this appears to be a suitable time to bank extra funds and await lower prices during this generational bull market in gold and silver.
 By agnewjim

04/05/2006  11:17PM

Concerning the Iranian Oil Bourse (exchange) that was to have exchanged oil for Euros instead of Dollars, it has been postponed for some reason (it was to have begun on 3/20/06). There was some discussion of this at the web site www.fmnn.com (Free Market News Network), although you may have to search for it.
Jim Agnew
 By Michael Miller

02/17/2006  7:31PM

HI DEBBIE. Your registration and e-mail is authentic and I assume your questions are as well. Unfortunately, I cannot answer them from memory and maybe there are no answers to some of your questions. Here is a little insight.
I SOLD GOLD today, but it will not be registered in any media or publications. The same is true for other gold producers. While returning to Alleghany in my truck, a caller to radio program said that Iran was rejecting the dollar as currency in March. No one called to challenge this statement. I have no idea if it is true. A while ago I wrote about the Dubai gold exchange that opened in November. I felt that a new player had entered the gold business with much wealth and it could be one factor in the rapidly escalating cost of an ounce of gold in dollars.
FOR THOSE PEOPLE who believe that a global war is underway, economics have always been an issue in war. Gold has a long history of economic value in trade. Maybe this is a reason the Feds have an interest in gold. Remember gold like dollars is used to establish exchange values. Just a short time ago I had to sell an ounce of Sixteen to One bullion for $250. Now I can sell that same ounce for $560. What has changed? Is it more than the dynamics of supply and demand? Unlike most other items of barter, gold’s intrinsic value is recognized the world over, especially by foreign producers of oil. Compare this to euros, the yen or dollars. Remember the Swiss franc? We do not hear much about the Swiss franc in the news today.
I HOPE SOMEONE else can answer your tough questions. Gold is very private. The Sixteen to One mine holds many ounces left to mine. Personally, I am very comfortable owning this American gold deposit. This is why I became a shareholder in 1975. Gold is here underground and ours to mine.
 By Debbie Clark

02/15/2006  1:15PM

I always read Bluejay’s entries. Thanks for putting yourself out there. Keep it up. Do any others out there try to look ahead to market conditions? If so, here are some questions I wish I knew answers.

How can I find the volume of gold trading other than the gold future reports? Who and how do the large producers sell their gold? How is gold sold in South Africa or foreign countries? Is it all just bookkeeping entries or cash exchanges? Are the central bankers selling off inventory or have they announced plans to?

What were people doing about gold (raw speculation okay)when the price was $260 an ounce a short time ago? Do any people or institutional investors buy gold to hold for the storage of wealth? Would love to read some fresh knowledge about gold and how it is important.
Why does fed reserve even care about the future of gold? Maybe because of fear of gold undermining dollar as the world's money, which is not likely because gold is harder to pass to others than paper or coins.

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50 | Page 51 | Page 52 | Page 53 | Page 54 | Page 55 | Page 56 | Page 57 | Page 58 | Page 59 | Page 60 | Page 61 | Page 62 | Page 63 | Page 64 | Page 65 ]


© 2021 Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc.
PO Box 909
Alleghany, California 95910

(530) 287-3223      
(530) 287-3455

      Gold Sales:  

(530) 287-3540


Design & development by
L. Kenez