July 5, 2022 

Gold Enters Major Bull Market


Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50 | Page 51 | Page 52 | Page 53 | Page 54 | Page 55 | Page 56 | Page 57 | Page 58 | Page 59 | Page 60 | Page 61 | Page 62 | Page 63 | Page 64 | Page 65 | Page 66 ]

 By bluejay

11/04/2008  8:44AM

Gold $762.40 up $40.40
Silver $10.51 up $ 0.71
Gold/XAU Ratio 8.49
Gold/Silver Ratio 72.61
Dollar Index 85.01 off 1.39

Gold is higher today following a weak dollar. Strong long term overhead resistance on the dollar chart is located at the 90 to 91.50 area. The dollar's high on its recent three month surge has been about 88.30. It is suspected that the dollar has already topped from its recent fast moving bear market rally.

It appears that too many dollar holders are falling over themselves as they become more aggressive in exiting their positions in the 87 to 88 area. Time will tell for them if they should have begun to liquidate their holdings sooner and at lower levels.

It's a great time to be considering selling the U.S. dollar and buying the Canadian dollar at .8621, the Australian dollar at .6996 and the Swiss Franc at .8661. The Canadian dollar is already up smartly from its recent lows in the .78 area.

As the U.S. dollar regains its terminal slide gold will benefit. We just have witnessed over the past months one of the most vicious bull market shakeouts in precious metals, base metals and their shares in recent history.

Historical charts clearly show that new intermediate bull markets, within major bull markets, spawn from the ashes of these types of breakdowns.

Last on gold is $756.80.
 By bluejay

11/03/2008  10:21AM

Last on gold is $727.70.

The following is an excerpt from a news release issued today from Emgold concerning the publishing by the city of Grass Valley of its environmental draft report:

The Idaho-Maryland mine was historically California's second largest underground gold mine producing 2.4 million ounces of gold from 1862 to 1956 at an average grade of 0.43 ounce per ton grade. It is adjacent to the historic Empire mine, which was Newmont Mining Corp.'s first operating mine. The Empire mine produced 5.8 million ounces of gold from 1850 to 1956. Newmont retains the mineral rights to this property. The Grass Valley mining district produced over 17 million ounces of gold and is historically one of the richest gold districts in North America.
 By bluejay

11/02/2008  10:32PM

Just a taste of what is coming.

The News Today
Posted: Nov 02 2008 By: Jim Sinclair Post Edited: November 3, 2008 at 1:24 am

Filed under: In The News

Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

Between 400,000 and 1,000,000 STILL cannot get access to their savings.

Don’t follow the spin, and let your guard down. This is the beginning, not the end. This could have been you!

The primary target that should be faced has not been even been aimed at. That target is called over the counter derivatives.

Part of the rescue is the use of an OTC derivative by the Federal Reserve - a swap.

Reserve Funds investors still waiting for their money
30 Oct 2008 11:53 am

This isn’t good:

At least 400,000 people, and perhaps as many as a million, can’t get access to their savings, a problem that has quietly persisted in spite of widely publicized federal efforts to restore confidence in money-fund investments.

Some of these customers — who, like most Americans, assumed their money funds were as safe and accessible as bank accounts — are getting desperate.

“Longer term, I just don’t know how we’ll deal with it,” said John Oakes, a retired engineer in Austin, Tex., who can’t tap $20,000 in a Reserve account to pay his mother’s nursing home bill. “They say we may get some money this week, but we don’t know if we’ll get 100 percent, 90 percent or 30 percent.”

Sandra and Lawton Dews, a retired couple in North Myrtle Beach, S.C., had more than $250,000 — 35 percent of their retirement assets –invested in the Reserve US Government Fund.

“They even bragged that you could sleep at night if you invested in their funds,” Mrs. Dews said. “In the past month and a half, we don’t sleep at all.”

Her insomnia began soon after Sept. 15, when the Reserve Fund was hit by a wave of redemptions, apparently because its largest fund had a stake in notes backed by the newly bankrupt Lehman Brothers.
 By bluejay

11/02/2008  11:14AM

Last on gold is $723.70.

The following article clearly reports the the debt abyss that is consuming the nation.

National Debt Soars $500B In Under A Month
Financial Bailout Plan The Primary Culprit In Record-Setting Debt Accumulation
Nov. 1, 2008

(CBS) This story was written by CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller

It’s the surge you won’t hear anyone boast about.

Never before in U.S. history has the national debt increased as much and as rapidly as it has over the past month.

Since September 30, the day the national debt hit the $10-trillion mark for the first time, the government has run up over $500 billion in new debt.

That’s more than the federal deficit for the entire 2008 fiscal year, which ended September 30. And it’s the most rapid increase in the national debt ever: over half a trillion dollars in less than a month - 23 days to be exact.

The government’s latest calculation of the national debt stands at $10,530,893,033,778.21 - that’s $10.5-trillion for short. It took less than four months for it to rocket to that level from $9.5 trillion on July 21.

Less than four months! To put it in perspective, consider this: it took the U.S. government over four decades, from 1940 to 1982, to run up its first trillion dollars of debt.

The second and third trillions were racked up much more quickly - each in just four years. And it only took from 1990 to 1992 for the national debt to hit $4 trillion.

On the day President Bush was sworn in, the debt stood at $5.7 trillion. Less than eight years later, the it’s within days of having swelled $5 trillion dollars on his watch - an embarrassing milestone for a president who considers himself a conservative and an advocate of fiscal discipline.

What’s to blame for the most recent surge in the debt? Above all else, it’s the federal government's response to the financial crisis.

“It’s the Supplementary Financing Program being run by Treasury to provide cash for the Federal Reserve,” says Corrine Hirsh, spokeswoman for the White House Office of Management and Budget.

By that, she means the billions of dollars disbursed by the Fed to keep the financial markets at home and abroad from collapsing. It includes the $124 billion used to keep insurance industry giant American International Group from going bust.

And this week, the Treasury Department started to spend the $700 billion dollars in the congressionally authorized bailout program, so the national debt can be expected to soar even more rapidly in the coming months.

But on January 20, it becomes another president’s problem. And unless he slashes federal spending or enacts major tax hikes, the ballooning deficit and debt leave no money for any of the big ticket programs he's promised to deliver.

Instead, the 44th president will have to deal with the problem of how to pay the interest on the expanding debt. If past practice holds, it’s a good bet the government will just borrow the money.
 By bluejay

11/01/2008  10:37PM

Last on gold is $723.70.

Extortion 101

Paulson's Swindle Revealed
By William Greider

October 29, 2008
The swindle of American taxpayers is proceeding more or less in broad daylight, as the unwitting voters are preoccupied with the national election. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson agreed to invest $125 billion in the nine largest banks, including $10 billion for Goldman Sachs, his old firm. But, if you look more closely at Paulson's transaction, the taxpayers were taken for a ride--a very expensive ride. They paid $125 billion for bank stock that a private investor could purchase for $62.5 billion. That means half of the public's money was a straight-out gift to Wall Street, for which taxpayers got nothing in return.

William Greider: United Steelworkers Union prez Leo Gerard cracks open the sweetheart deal that bailed out nine banks--and likely lined the Treasury Secretary's own pockets--with billions of taxpayer dollars. Does anybody care?

These are dynamite facts that demand immediate action to halt the bailout deal and correct its giveaway terms. Stop payment on the Treasury checks before the bankers can cash them. Open an immediate Congressional investigation into how Paulson and his staff determined such a sweetheart deal for leading players in the financial sector and for their own former employer. Paulson's bailout staff is heavily populated with Goldman Sachs veterans and individuals from other Wall Street firms. Yet we do not know whether these financiers have fully divested their own Wall Street holdings. Were they perhaps enriching themselves as they engineered this generous distribution of public wealth to embattled private banks and their shareholders?

Leo W. Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers, raised these explosive questions in a stinging letter sent to Paulson this week. The union did what any private investor would do. Its finance experts vetted the terms of the bailout investment and calculated the real value of what Treasury bought with the public's money. In the case of Goldman Sachs, the analysis could conveniently rely on a comparable sale twenty days earlier. Billionaire Warren Buffett invested $5 billion in Goldman Sachs and bought the same types of securities--preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock in the future. Only Buffett's preferred shares pay a 10 percent dividend, while the public gets only 5 percent. Dollar for dollar, Buffett "received at least seven and perhaps up to 14 times more warrants than Treasury did and his warrants have more favorable terms," Gerard pointed out.

"I am sure that someone at Treasury saw the terms of Buffett's investment," the union president wrote. "In fact, my suspicion is that you studied it pretty closely and knew exactly what you were doing. The 50-50 deal--50 percent invested and 50 percent as a gift--is quite consistent with the Republican version of spread-the-wealth-around philosophy."

The Steelworkers' close analysis was done by Ron W. Bloom, director of the union's corporate research and a Wall Street veteran himself who worked at Larzard Freres, the investment house. Bloom applied standard valuation techniques to establish the market price Buffett paid per share compared to Treasury's price. "The analysis is based on the assumption that Warren Buffett is an intelligent third party investor who paid no more for his investment than he had to," Bloom's report explained. "It also assumes that Gold Sachs' job is to protect its existing shareholders so that it extracted from Mr. Buffett the most that it could.... Further, it is assumed that Henry Paulson is likewise an intelligent man and that if he paid any more than Mr. Buffett--if he paid $1 for something for which Mr. Buffett would have paid 50 cents--that the difference is a gift from the taxpayers of the United States to the shareholders of Goldman Sachs."

The implications are staggering. Leo Gerard told Paulson: "If the result of our analysis is applied to the deals that you made at the other eight institutions--which on average most would view as being less well positioned than Goldman and therefore requiring an even greater rate of return--you paid a$125 billion for securities for which a disinterested party would have paid $62.5 billion. That means you gifted the other $62.5 billion to the shareholders of these nine institutions."

If the same rule of thumb is applied to Paulson's grand $700 billion bailout fund, Gerard said this will constitute a gift of $350 billion from the American taxpayers "to reward the institutions that have driven our nation and it now appears the whole world into its most serious economic crisis in 75 years."

Is anyone angry? Will anyone look into these very serious accusations? Congress is off campaigning. The financiers at Treasury probably assume any public outrage will be lost in the election returns. I hope they are mistaken.

About William Greider
National affairs correspondent William Greider has been a political journalist for more than thirty-five years. A former Rolling Stone and Washington Post editor, he is the author of the national bestsellers One World, Ready or Not, Secrets of the Temple, Who Will Tell The People, The
 By bluejay

10/30/2008  11:42PM

Last on gold is $733.50.

For a behind the scenes analysis on what's up and where gold is going, go to http://www.jsmineset.com and read Mr. Jim Sinclair's commentary, "The Beginning Of A Great Economic Drama."

Also, in another commentary Mr. Sinclair states that he is buying gold future contracts and will be taking deliveries of the 100 ounce contracts on a monthly trading cycle basis.
 By bluejay

10/30/2008  11:31AM

Last on gold is $734.40.

In another daily vain attempt at approaching the $775 area gold has failed to hold and has slid back with renewed selling pressure. The move above recent resistance at $748 or abouts is now moot.

An anticipated major low on gold will apparently take its time and on its own terms to establish. At the moment, $680 is its recent down spike low.

Yesterday the Fed reduced its benchmark interest rate lower by one half point from 1.5% to 1.0% to lessen major threats to economic growth and did not rule out more reductions to follow.

Lower interest rates eat up bank capital as it stimulates the redemption of higher interest debt. This occurs when the redemption amount is higher resulting from lower interest rates. When rates go down bonds go up, as an example, thus retiring the original debt becomes more expensive and eats up capital in the process. The bailout package is intended to replenish lost bank capital.

The banker's and the Treasury's greatest fear is that the banks will go belly-up for lack of capital. The derivatives mess only adds to their problems. Reacting to banking troubles, people have been pulling their funds out of these institutions and into U.S. Treasuries and into gold and silver. The threat has been so great that the FDIC has recently announced doubling the insurance levels for funds on deposit at banks.

On an important note, people must know exactly what insurance means. In the worst case scenario, what are the mechanics of returning your insured money?? One possiblity that some folks might not like is how the money is returned to them. Will it be in restricted Treasury instruments? Will it be in another short term irredeemable form of some sorts?

This is the main reason that the western central bankers became part of a major price suppression scheme in July to effect gold and silver prices. It seems that the Asian markets have been buying gold when they are open for business and as trading switches to London and in the U.S. at the infamous COMEX Exchange prices fall on a somewhat, regular basis.

Paul Van Eeden of Canada has generally stated that the approximate area of $650 is a rock-bottom low price for gold based on current monetary expansion. Some months ago Paul correctly forecast lower base metal prices based on his projection of reduced economic activity.

These unanticipated lower prices in gold and silver should continue to be considered a rare purchase opportunity and certainly, not a time to sell.
 By bluejay

10/29/2008  6:10PM

Last on gold is $768.10.

Check out this 80 year view on the sell-offs in the Barron's Gold Stock Index.

 By bluejay

10/29/2008  5:58PM

Last on gold is $766.30

The following in an eye-opening article concerning China's future and our worsening status in the eyes of the world.

I'm fed up to the ears with old men dreaming up wars for young men to die in.
– George McGovern

Source: antiwar.com
October 28, 2008
A Win-Win Situation for China

by Sascha Matuszak
China currently stands alone in its ability to weather virtually any storm the banking crisis in the U.S. whips up. With almost $2 trillion in foreign currency reserves, China can afford to be unconcerned about an economic decline in the West that spreads throughout the world, hurting dependent and emerging economies from Pakistan to Panama.

China is not completely insulated from the economic crisis – a slowdown in orders from abroad and a credit crunch at home will hurt the Chinese economy like it hasn't been hurt before – but the difference is preparation. China is prepared, socially and economically, for a slowdown. The U.S. is not.

The calls are beginning for China to step forward as a responsible stakeholder and shore up the currencies and liquidity of the Asian economies and help ease the pressure on European banks as well. China, in turn, assures the world that it is "seriously" considering its options and the proposals of near-desperate bankers hoping that China's 20-year economic rise will help defuse the West's 20-year economic decline.

China is now in a position of power that it may have been enjoying for years, but it is now becoming even more apparent. The talk of China taking over the world has always been a "what if" scenario accompanied by calls for social and political reform and sidelong glances at the U.S., still considered by many to be the preeminent power in the world. The next few years will see more and more nations gathering under the umbrella of Chinese solvency and leaving the Coalition of the Willing(ly Misled) behind.

For now, China is taking care of its own through land reform that should give peasants in China the freedom to "lease their land use rights to other individuals or companies, such as big farm contractors, or to exchange them" and send hordes of country folk flocking toward the cities with their loot looking for fortune. This is the latest in a development, started after Deng Xiao Ping took over in 1979, that will bring the peasants of China into the social fold and eventually urbanize the nation.

China hopes to protect its domestic and international interests through increasing the sophistication of its military. In the final frontier, the U.S. is "apoplectic" over the success of a Chinese space program that has now "changed the game" with the recent Shenzhou manned space mission and the addition of a surveillance satellite that passed within 30 mi. of the International Space Station. According to the Richard Fisher in the Asia Times:

"By the middle of the next decade the PLA [People's Liberation Army] will have a robust surveillance satellite network that will allow a many-times daily target tasking on a global level. It will also have the ability to perform 'information operations' by being able to give a range of clients updates on global U.S. military activities multiple times a day."

China might be getting those rushes of adrenaline one gets when victory is nigh and your opponent lies struggling in your dust trail. America's irresponsible, immoral leadership in the White House, on Wall Street, and by extension throughout the world has finally come home to roost with this economic crisis. Now, with the giant of the 20th century down and in trouble, all of the nations in the world that have suffered under America's benevolent hegemony are looking for somewhere to hide.

This is exactly what the Chinese leadership has hoped and prayed for and most likely expected: the return of China to the center of the world.

Supposed allies of the U.S. are looking to China for help in these days of crisis, with Thailand's deputy prime minister, Olarn Chaipravat, who is attending the Asia-Europe Meeting, stating in the Sydney Morning Herald:

''The message of this initiative is for China to consider whether or not China would open up its banking system and allow the strongest currency in the world, which is the Chinese yuan, relative to anybody, to be the rightful and anointed convertible currency of the world."

Pakistan's President Ali Asif Zardari just finished a visit to China in which he declared that he would be ready to "visit every three months" and that Pakistan's economic and security crises are best solved through cooperation with China, not with the U.S.

The whole Asia-Europe Meeting is a sign of times to come. Nobody trusts U.S. leadership anymore, and despite China's list of thuggish buddies (Burma, Sudan, Iran, North Korea, etc.), protest-strangling Great Firewall, and tendency to sell counterfeit and/or tainted goods, world leaders are choosing China. What an incredible statement about the influence and reputation of the U.S.

The bailouts engineered by the central banks of Europe and the U.S. represent the desperation of thieves caught in the act together, not sympathy and goodwill between two staunch allies. The collapse of Wall Street is the last act in the tragedy of America's fall from leadership in the world.

So What?

What we will see is the decisive triumph of the merchants in the low-level battle over what to do with China. Many of the campaigns to halt human rights abuses in China will migrate to the fringe of U.S. policy, if they haven't already, and the tone will ease.

The U.S. will not be able to confront nations with the arrogance of a world leader and the righteous indignation of a moral compass. For many of us, this is a development that has been a long time coming, but for most of America, it will be something very new.

What Americans lack more than anything is a concept of history. It is absolutely natural and normal and desirable for a nation to go through hardship and struggle and eventual transformation. The era of the American Imperium, dependent on historical ignorance and determined action, is over.

What is needed now is a domestic revival and a more nuanced and intelligent approach to international relations. This means talking with people before we bomb them. This means an emphasis on cooperation, not obedience.

China's sound economy and pragmatic, if despotic, leadership make whatever happens in the coming American election into an opportunity to gain political capital or financial assets. It's a win-win either way.
 By bluejay

10/29/2008  11:59AM

Gold $754.00 Up $10.20
Silver $9.83 Up $ 0.64
Gold/XAU Ratio 9.53
Gold/Silver 76.70

Gold is higher today as it has pushed above some recent daily resistance in the $745 area. Gold reached higher into the vicinity of the previous important low spike reached some weeks back at $675 where China was reported to have taken gold from two failing hedge funds. Reaching this level awoke the bear element in the market as the attack dogs were unleashed chasing the buyers and driving the price back down to about $752. Hopefully, the $745 level holds which is now short term support.

We read in the paper that every asset has been effected by margin calls, failing hedge funds and fearful selling but never is it mentioned in the general news that there are entities out there that have agendas for twisting people's minds concerning the banking industry by trashing gold and silver. Sure, it's reported that the public is leary of banks these days but no reports concerning the US Treasury's efforts to depress the precious metals prices.

It's been the belief here that all along that a great transfer of wealth is taking place from the public into the hands of connected people or entities and foreign countries, especially China. One just has to take note of all the shenanigans that have taken place to force all the gold and silver related stocks down to the bottom of the pit.

Unbridled savage attacks of the exploration sector in Canada have left that group devastated with percentage declines of 80% and more common. The naked short sellers have been ravaging shareholder's assets as if they were prey locked in a cage. What has been permitted in Canada says very little of the country's regulators. The regulator's up there run a "so-called" honor system with the naked shorts, they just have to state that they have intentions to deliver sold stock and THAT IS IT. One would have a difficult time proving that the regulators weren't crooks themselves.

In this country the SEC has allowed the gold stocks to be pummeled unmercifully by naked short selling, effecting lower prices without delivering any shares. Not many in Washington care to admit this. The gold and the gold stock shelling is working on the minds of the public and is putting money into the pockets of thiefs.

The trading norm of the relationship of the XAU Gold & Silver Index to gold was, with a few minor exceptions, 3 to about 6. Each time the Index reached the neighborhood of 6 the gold stocks were a buy and when they returned to the 3 to 1 ratio with gold it was time to sell them for followers of this intermediate to long term trading approach.

Last week the Index hit 11.50. Where did this come from? It's all the naked shorts looking for more and more of the investor's blood. Hello, Mr. Cox are you there? Cox is the head of the SEC and is the worst do-nothing Chairman of all-time.

Jim Rogers has said other guys in government along with their handlers, the banks, have messed up the system far more than the average person comprehends. Like Jim Sinclair says, no one wants to talk of OTC derivatives. They are all sucking the system dry in their final attempt to make off with all the silverware before their day comes to an end with disgrace and a lot big money stuffed into their pockets.

Unfortunately as has already been established from the Blanchard-Barrick lawsuit in New orleans the governement and their agents are immune from prosecution, how convenient. So that just leaves the banks and certain connected people to answer.

Jim Sinclair has said that the massive OTC derivatices disaster can't be remedied. All the Treasury can do is hide the problem and hope that it goes away. Fat chance! The Fed buys the junk contracts in exchange for more taxpayer debt and the banks get a free pass with massive infusions so they can start over again. This is the biggest crime of the century, all at our expense. Even the banks have influenced their buddies in government to lower generally accepts accounting standards to put a value on all the worthless derivatives that they still hold.

In Japan the banks did the samething 18 years ago with all their junk real estate loans. Banks that lie about their real worth are known as "zombie banks."

In this country all the banks are basically bankrupt. Why do you think the government is giving them all this money, our money? There capital has evaporated with 28 years of declining interest rates as Mr. Antal Fekete has so brilliantly described in past articles.

Golden Sachs and J.P. Morgan recently reclassified themselves as banks and now the both of them are in line with the other banks milking us of our long term financial security as a country.

When this mess finally ends, if ever, all these criminals will be holding gold, silver and all the related companies and they will have secured them at fire-sale prices that they, themselves, created. That is why it is important to just tune out from all these temporary, ridiculously low prices.

What do you do when a burglar approaches your home at night? You lock all the doors and windows, hunker down and be prepared, you most certainly don't run away crying in hysterics.

On another note, the Chinese have been recently more vocal with their thoughts on our continuing meltdown. The "People's Daily" the official newspaper of China's ruling communist party recently stated the following, "Growing chorus of Chinese disdain for Washington's economic policies and financial dominance in the wake of the credit crisis." "The U.S. has plundered the world's wealth."

China is quite worried and with the recent strength of the dollar inspired by financial unrest in Europe who could blame them for quietly reducing their masssive exposure to the dollar. This is one significant reason that the recent strong rally of the dollar is doomed and gold's rebound is near.

One reason that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were temporarily saved is that China holds one fifth of their total agency debt. This amounts to $447.50 billion as of June of 2008. China also for the same period holds $502 billion in US treasuries.

One thing the Treasury doesn't want and that is a panic out of the dollar of which China would not really want to be part of. China is more of a methodical buyer and seller. It would be quite naive if anyone would assume that China is not buying gold, silver and many of the bigger precious metals companies along with base metals and their producing companies and relieving themselves of their excessive dollar holdings.

Go Gold!
 By bluejay

10/27/2008  10:23AM

Last on gold is $741.30.

A link is provided to the December 08 commodity chart where you can get an idea of trading volume in the most popular month. This does not include the electronic market.

It is difficult to pinpoint volume. Dan Norcini does a commitment of traders volume chart about every week at jsmineset.com with comments.

 By Hans Kummerow

10/27/2008  6:06AM

Over here in Europe Gold is trading at US $ 720,00 per ounce right now.
The traders say that Equity Funds are unloading large amounts of gold to cough up cash for withdrawals and to meet stiff margin calls.
As far as I can see, Scoop, no purchases are possible at US$ 600,00. Not yet - at least.

10/24/2008  10:36AM

Please, please, please, Bluejay or someone with the access to and the brains to figure this out. What amounts of gold in ounces(volume) are trading to set these lows. Shocking to see $600's. Who were the lucky stiffs who now own it and how much was available at that price?? Can we get this from future contract sells and buys? Scoop's not too flush right now but Gold in the $600's, who could resist if we knew how to get gold at that price?
 By bluejay

10/24/2008  9:30AM

Last on gold is 745.60. We may have hit bottom today.
 By bluejay

10/24/2008  9:24AM


Gold is currently higher at $736.50 substantially above an early morning low of $680.30.
 By bluejay

10/22/2008  6:23PM

Last on gold is $721.50.

It wouldn't surprise me with the storm of storms hitting the precious metals and especially their stocks that the manipulators eventually someday will all be behind bars.

The following attachment is must reading for those that continue to hold part or all of their wealth in Treasury bonds.

 By bluejay

10/22/2008  10:18AM

Gold $735.00 off $34.90
Silver $9.38 off $ 0.65
Gold/XAU Ratio 9.58(This figure indicates that gold stocks have never been cheaper compared to the last in gold)
Gold/Silver Ratio 78.36

The suspected secret meeting to assassinate the precious metals and their stocks between the Plunge Protection Team and bankers, plus possibly some select hedge funds, that took place in late June continues unchecked.

As Hans has pointed out physical gold is more fun. Well, this paper party that is permitted to persist by the SEC with the shares along with the CFTC's and their controlled paper exchanges is becoming disheartening to all believers in honest money.

In July the banks went wild shorting gold and silver in an unaccustomary manner. By requesting their help to join in on the raid the Treasury and the Fed thought it a good idea to build up their dwindling reserves a little at our expense.

The psyche of short sellers significantly hinges on massive destruction and pain. So, has the plan not accomplished their goal?

A government's role in manipulating gold and silver has always been the same: destroy competition when our fiat currency system starts to falter. Stalin did it to silver years ago when the people hung on to their coins as that currency's value was collapsing. Stalin even executed his collecting agents when they didn't acquire it fast enough from the poor people and even some clerks who were tallying up how much had been collected. Following, the people fearing for their lives relunctantly turned it over.

Are we not almost in the same position today as fear of declining prices scare us into either selling or contemplating it? In 1931 when the gold was called in by FDR there were also threats extended to the people that scared them to part with it. If you didn't turn it in you would be fined and possibly sent to jail. Fear is the name of their game. Today in modern times, it's instilled fear through manipulation of rapidly falling prices to hold a faltering malignant currency and keep our funds in a suspect banking system to save their asses.

So, when any fiat currency starts to falter, as is the case now from increasing astronomical debt, the SCARE TACTICS have surfaced boldly once again. If you and I tried this scheme why wouldn't we expect to be incarcerated? Manipulating the precious metals and stocks is no less than a crime against the public.

History will always be our guide: Who did it benefit and who did it hurt to part with the gold and silver during financial upsetting and confusing times? The answer is clear.

In the months and years ahead severe price inflation as the result of mounting monetary increases will result. The true time and tested wealth protector will mostly be in holding gold and the companies that produce it. There will no other way around this. Eventually, gold will be the victor not some debt ridden paper factory.

It's important to accept that the prices being reported on gold, especially, is just a vain attempt by scared public officials to remove the threat by the people against their imploding mismanaged US dollar. The sad part is that certain closely associated private entities are greatly benefiting by the use of inside information being supplied ahead of time by criminals that work inside our government and their friends.

The friends are the banks and the two remaining big brokerage firms that are now calling themselves banks plus some suspected loyal hedge funds. Hedge funds? Believe it or not, some hedge funds have actually attended meetings of the Plunge Protection Team consisting of the Treasury, the Fed, the SEC and the CFTC. And who controls the PPT? It's our commanding chief.

The good news for holders of gold and their gold stocks is that this man's family is long gold through their interest in the powerful Carlyle Group. The Carlyle Group holds the majority of the remaining long sides of many gold hedges that producers continue to hold.

If history is any guide, time will not wait much longer for gold prices to turn abruptly higher and the lofty artifically pegged dollar much lower.
 By Hans Kummerow

10/21/2008  11:13PM

Whilst trillions of US-Dollars and Euros are handed over to the financial markets by the Feds of this world we should remember where all this money comes from:

I is not coming from tax-increases because everybody is talking about tax-cuts.

I is not coming from saved gov't expenditures because additional gov't spending is encouraged anywhere on this globe during the crisis.

Money is created as book-money garanteed by the people who have the authority to print the money on real paper if the markets won't believe in their books.

And as far as the physical markets and the paper markets for gold are concerned - let's stay physical. It is more fun anyway.
 By Michael Miller

10/20/2008  3:16PM

Massive selling or selling pressure usually drive prices down faster than massive buying or buying pressure. True or false?

Short selling, naked selling or selling what you do not have but either have a source for delivery or a source for borrowing influences driving a price down. True or false?

Owners or keepers of a commodity usually are more reluctant to sell the commodity when they believe the current price will increase in the days ahead. True or false?

In order to gain insight about spot price fluctuations of gold, one needs data about the volumes of outstanding: short sales, pledged supply, daily or monthly new mine production, sources of supply (the more the better), coin sales, bullion sales, central bank exchanges, and……more.

Facts are important for gaining a worthwhile opinion. Next comes a useable formula. Then a good market statistician well versed in computer programming could set the gold speculation world aglow. Are you out there? If so please write this FORUM. I would be one of many interested gold players.
 By bluejay

10/18/2008  11:29PM

Last on gold is $782.90.

Posted On: Sunday, October 19, 2008, 12:10:00 AM EST

The Bullion Market Versus The Paper Gold Market - An Explanation

Author: Jim Sinclair

Dear Friends,

It is axiomatic that the most leveraged gold market most often (95 percent of the time) sets the price of any cash market. First derivatives (listed futures) commands price.

This remains true as long as the COMEX warehouse of gold is NOT meaningfully depleted by long gold contracts by taking delivery from the exchange warehouse.

As long as an exchange maintains a warehouse that historically overwhelms historical demand for delivery the first derivative, The COMEX listed gold future, will be the primary cause of price.

Taking delivery from the COMEX warehouse is not an easy process as the system is designed not to violate your contract but to be a world-class pain in the ass.

The COMEX requires re-assays, assuming you wish to re-deliver. This then places another raving pain in the ass in your way.

The COMEX market is effectively an international 24-hour market as there is no location where you cannot buy or sell a COMEX clone.

Cash bullion gold as opposed to the semi cash markets that non-USA banks trade is the only totally private means of buying and selling gold.

As currency problems increase, first the knowledgeable public such as you clean out the coin market.

This is the first time that the international coin markets have been cleaned out everywhere. This did not happen globally in the 70s.

Large gold bars are still available in major markets but the backup inventory is getting low.

As long as the COMEX warehouse remains adequate and large bars still are available, the paper market, the leveraged COMEX market, will rule the price.

Only with a decline in COMEX warehouse inventories and a run down in large bar supplies of the cash market will the cash bullion market command the price of the COMEX futures market.

It was not the buying by the Hunts that caused silver to move above $30 into the $50 area, but rather the universal belief that they would take delivery, which would deplete or exceeded the COMEX warehouse supply.

The War between paper gold and bullion gold is a war to determine which will take command of the price of gold, nothing more, nothing less.

There will be no two markets trading at different prices.

All this battle is about is IF the bullion gold market is going to take the lead in making the singular price away from the traditional axiom that the most leveraged market makes the price. I believe the bullion, in these most unique conditions, will command the one gold price making it hard to impossible to manipulate the gold price via the paper gold market, as is the practice every day.

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50 | Page 51 | Page 52 | Page 53 | Page 54 | Page 55 | Page 56 | Page 57 | Page 58 | Page 59 | Page 60 | Page 61 | Page 62 | Page 63 | Page 64 | Page 65 | Page 66 ]


© 2022 Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc.
PO Box 909
Alleghany, California 95910

(530) 287-3223      
(530) 287-3455

      Gold Sales:  

(530) 287-3540


Design & development by
L. Kenez