April 18, 2021 

Gold Enters Major Bull Market


Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50 | Page 51 | Page 52 | Page 53 | Page 54 | Page 55 | Page 56 | Page 57 | Page 58 | Page 59 | Page 60 | Page 61 | Page 62 | Page 63 | Page 64 ]

 By bluejay

05/22/2009  12:54AM

Last on gold is $952.00

“Gold cannot decline from its highs as it will be incorporated into the national and international monetary systems at that time.”
–Alf Fields, May 20, 2009

Now do you have any questions why Fund Wizard Paulson just got long a few billion dollars worth of Gold ETFs and a few major gold producers?

Finally a major event has taken place that is a US dollar milestone.

The financing and extremely important event is the arrangement between China and Brazil displaces the dollar as China becomes the major trading partner with Brazil. Since then the Rial has been celebrating and the dollar has been depressed.

This is a once in approximately a century replacement of a trading currency that has always meant a dethronement of the deposed and coronation of a new currency king.

The last time this happened was when the US dollar supplanted the British Pound as the major trading currency and entity with Brazil 79 years ago.

It took the Brits 300 years to supplant the Portuguese Escudo with the British Pound.

Only twice has this occurred in 379 years. This is obscure to most but not to Mr. Paulson the hedge wizard. Obscure to most, but not to our gang at JSMineset.

The dollar died in Rio and that means everywhere.\

The dollar is in for a very cold winter.

There is one thing that is absolutely certain and that is Gold is now headed to at least $1650 and in all probability much higher. This is happening NOW!

What more do you need to know?
 By bluejay

05/16/2009  10:04AM

Gold closed the week at $930.90

Evidently, the Telegraph took a lot of heat from Washinton concerning the recent article entitled "Geithner Enriches Speculators in "Sham Bank" Bail-Outs and took the story down from their website.

The truth will set you free.

The interaction between government, the media, and Wall Street.

Thursday, May 14, 2009
Geithner enriches speculators in "sham" bank bail-outs - Telegraph

Update (May 15): The article that was linked to this posting has been taken down by the newspaper. So, now you will not only not hear about it on CNBC, it is not in the press anywhere.

Original post:
At the Qatar Global Investment Forum, Mark Patterson shed some light on Geithner's Wall Street giveaway plan. This is not new information to Fraudonomics readers, but it is nice to have someone who is participating in the scheme tell the truth for a change. His words would cut like a knife if anyone in the government gave a damn about anything other than enriching the friends of Timmy and Ben.

Notice that the story is being carried by a British newspaper. I doubt if you will hear about it on CNBC. Enjoy!

Geithner enriches speculators in "sham" bank bail-outs - Telegraph: "The US Treasury’s effort to stabilise the banking system through the TARP programme is a hopelessly ill-conceived policy that enriches speculators at public expense, according to the buy-out firm supposed to be pioneering the joint public-private bank rescues.

“The taxpayers ought to know that we are in effect receiving a subsidy. They put in 40pc of the money but get little of the equity upside,” said Mark Patterson, chairman of MatlinPatterson Advisers.

The comments are likely to infuriate Tim Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary, because MatlinPatterson took advantage of the TARP’s matching funds to buy Flagstar Bancorp in Michigan. His confession appears to validate concerns that the bail-out strategy is geared towards Wall Street.

Under the convoluted deal agreed earlier this year, MatlinPatterson has come to own 80pc of the shares while the US government has ended up with under 10pc.

Mr Patterson said the US Treasury is out of its depth and seems to be trying to put off drastic action by pretending that the banking system is still viable.

“It’s a sham. The banks are insolvent. The US government is trying to sedate the public because they are down to the last $100bn (£66bn) of the $700bn TARP funds. They think they’re doing this for the greater good of society,” he said, speaking at the Qatar Global Investment Forum.

Mr Patterson said it would be better for the US to bite the bullet as Britain has done, accepting that crippled lenders must be nationalised. “At least the British are not hiding the bail-out,” he said.

MatlinPatterson said private equity and hedge funds were deluding themselves in hoping to go back to business as usual after the trauma of the last 18 months.

“This is not a normal recession and there will be no V-shaped recovery. The crisis has destroyed leveraged companies. We’re going to see a catastrophic increase in the number of LBO’s (leveraged buyouts) going into default because they’re knee-deep in debt and no solution exists since they can’t refinance,” he said.

“Alfa hedge funds have been making their money by gambling with excessive leverage, so the knife that cuts off leverage is going to cut off their heads as well,” he said.

Like many bears, Mr Patterson expects the great crunch to end in deliberate inflation, deemed a lesser evil than outright depression.

“The US government has thrown 29pc of GDP at this crisis compared to 8pc in the early 1930s. The Fed’s balance sheet has risen from $900bn to $2.7 trillion to bail out the system. America has to do it because the only way out is to debase the currency, but that is going to lead to some very high inflation three years down the road,” he said.

Matlin Patterson, however, has missed the Spring rebound, the most powerful rise in equities in over 70 years. “We shorted the equity rally because we thought it was lunatic. We’ve kept adding positions seven times, and we’re still holding,” he said. Ouch!"
 By bluejay

05/10/2009  8:38PM

Last of gold is $915.00.

The following submitted excerpts of a longer report were written by Mr. Murry Pollitt who is president of Pollitt & Company in Toronto.

Usually I provide a link but since these copied excerpts were from Agoracom.com it wouldn't have been easy to access, so no link.

Most interesting which you don't see often is Mr. Pollitt's questioning the accuracy of GFMS's(formerly Gold Fields Mineral Services) reporting and why? Otherwise, the excerpts are an excellent presentation of the truth concerning the lengths that some groups will go to to keep gold's price depressed and why those efforts are becoming strained.

Murray Pollitt: The gold monetization scheme is ending

By Murray Pollitt
Pollitt & Co., Toronto
Thursday, April 30, 2009

The G8 appears finished but their policymakers continue to try to bend the G20, and the world, to their will. The establishment, the Fed, the Bank of England, the Bank for International Settlements, the same gang that has been setting policy for decades, is still at it. They appear to remain in charge (with nary a whimper of criticism about the trillions of dollars' worth of damage their policies have caused) but, when it comes to gold, they are slowly losing their grip.

Besides setting the stage decades ago for sub-prime paper, CDSs, and so on, it appears policymakers embarked on a scheme, at more or less the same time, to monetize the hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of gold lying sterile in central bank vaults. The temptation was too much. One-percent income on gold for a central bank was better than nothing, so the argument ran, and for the Lehman types borrowing gold (and selling it) provided lots of money (capital) to play games with.

It was so easy. Besides, the gold carry trade involved selling lots of gold into the market and this helped keep the price down (and hopefully the dollar up), a subject near and dear to policymakers.

It also led to: a) huge mine hedging with the two biggest miners, each with a link to Morgan, together short over 30 million ounces ("making money on gold in the ground" was the argument) and b) significant outright central bank sales, which may have been interventionist or may have been for portfolio diversification, however ill-advised.

And if banks and markets didn't always follow the script, there was always high-level intervention. To illustrate the mindset, in 2004 one William White, advisor to the BIS, talked about the need for "international credits and joint efforts to influence asset prices (especially gold and foreign exchange) in circumstances where this might be thought useful." The idea of rigging markets is as old as the hills, and if the government is on your side. ...

Anyway, the great gold monetization (mobilization?) scheme appears to have started in the 1980s and the following events that, in part, characterize it are not necessarily in sequence.

1) Goldman bought gold dealer J. Aron.

2) In an early gold carry trade, Drexel borrowed hundreds of tonnes of gold from Portugal.

3) All the big swinging banks sought to get into the gold game and they bought all the London gold dealers except Rothschild, which was definitely in on the game on its own.

4) Mine hedging was pushed very hard, to a peak of about 120 million ounces.

5) Greenspan and others dropped broad hints that central Banks stood "ready" to supply gold to the market.

6) Drexel went broke and it apparently took Portugal five years to recover its gold.

7) Two long-term gold players, Republic and Safra, each with a somewhat checkered past, had a shotgun wedding. Later Mr. Safra was fried to death in his Monte Carlo apartment, presumably for nonrepayment of gold.

8) Two of the largest American players, JP Morgan and Chase, also had a shotgun wedding and now carry more gold derivatives than can be imagined.

9) Much of the Drexel brain trust apparently went to work for AIG, which promptly started boasting about mine hedging.

10) HSBC (often advised by Paul Volcker) bought Midland Bank (which had earlier bought bullion dealer Samuel Montagu) and, in another shotgun wedding, bought Republic, transactions that made HSBC one of the major gold players. HSBC's U.S. subsidiary is now the custodian for the SPDR ETF.

11) When the gold price started to move up, Rothschild said enough and sold its "book" (at a loss?) to Barclays.

12) Finally there was recently a shotgun wedding between Dresdner bank and Commerzbank.

Crisp details are rare, but the past generation has seen hundreds of millions of ounces of gold bled into the market. Canadian and Australian gold reserves are gone; Britain, Switzerland, and many others are down by two-thirds.

But this doesn't count the gold that has been lent. In general it seems that the same sort of banks that got into trouble investing in high-yield, low-quality sub- prime paper have also taken short positions in low-yield, high-quality gold. Too many favorite-son banks are on the wrong side of the market for policymakers to be rational. Given the option between common sense and helping a bank, well, the record is clear. This is probably the main reason the establishment remains anti-gold today -- the old ideological reasons are not that relevant.

So once again they trot out the idea of International Monetary Fund gold sales. What rubbish. The IMF hasn't sold gold since the 1970s, but every year the idea is advanced to frighten the gold market. Why would the IMF sell $10 billion of gold when central banks are printing $10 billion of new money every day? Gold is the only IMF asset worth 100 cents on the dollar -- everything else is junk.

As well the establishment hammers on the idea that the gold price is high, and GFMS continues its weird forecasts.

Well, the gold price is not high. Oil and several other commodities have outperformed gold since World War II. A good underground gold mine may grade 5 parts per million (ppm) while a good open pit may grade 1 ppm.

Nobody who has said the gold price is high has ever spent a nine-hour shift drilling rock -- it's a tough business. God only knows the blood-to-gold ratio for old Roman mines in Spain or Spanish mines in Peru, and getting the gold from mine to home base was often not easy. Much Victorian gold went from Ashanti by caravan through Timbuktu, the Sahara, and on to Europe -- the Brits were hardly keen to auction it off then.

Gold mine production is down about 12 percent from the 2001 peak (and still falling) and Barrick shares have barely moved in a decade. Much of the industry's cash flow is attributable to accounting magic, and the long years, even decades, of gold price suppression have taken their toll. There are few major new mines on the horizon, and lots of old ones on the way out.

Notwithstanding, GFMS has consistently forecast rising production for the past eight years (even though it has consistently fallen), raising the question: Why?

Our guess is that GFMS' big clients are the very banks we refer to above, the ones on the wrong side of the market, and for them Ms. Rosy Scenario needs the healthy, and expanding, industry model that GFMS gives them.

What are companies like Commerzbank and Societe Generale doing sponsoring GFMS anyway? Neither Germany nor France has any gold mining industry at all.

One would have to be barking mad not to see the benefits a higher gold price would have on vast chunks of the global economy. Even long-suffering Zimbabwe would be a huge beneficiary, and more wealth in Africa and Latin America would mean more exports of Fords and Cats from the United States. The establishment may not care, but that won't stop G20 members (and others) from connecting the dots and following China's lead in increasing gold weighting in monetary reserves.

Gold is again becoming a preferred central bank asset and the great monetization scheme is coming to an end. Western policymakers and banks have pushed their game too far for too long and the combination of the shift of power from G8 to G20, plus the reduced availability of gold, will turn the tide. You can sell gold only once, although, in the new wondrous world of derivatives, maybe somebody has actually sold it twice.


Murry Pollitt is president of Pollitt & Co., a brokerage firm in Toronto, and a veteran of mining industry finance. This essay is excerpted from his latest letter client letter and reprinted by permission.
 By bluejay

05/08/2009  8:33PM

Gold closed the week at $916.20, up about $16.

The dollar(USDX) closed out the week at 82.41, off about 2.50.

One last entry on the US Dollar from Jim Sinclair tonight at http://www.jsmineset.com:

My Dear Friends,

Under USDX .8200 the wheels of hyperinflation start turning.

Under USDX .7200 the impact of hyperinflation is visible to anyone who can see.

Under USDX .6200 the Quantitative Easing madness hits the fan

Under USDX .5200 Zimbabwe economics now being practiced become a US dollar condition moniker.


Respectfully yours,
 By bluejay

05/08/2009  5:20PM

Last on gold is $916.20.

The following remarks concerning the Dollar were made by an agoracom.com poster.

Terresainte is from Geneva

Dollar on retreat today -1.8% vs euro, -2.2% vs swissie

posted on May 08, 09 02:53PM

Would this be the beginning of the managed dollar takedown, e.g. vs hard currencies gold, silver? a hidden tax on dollar denominated holdings and purchasing power, no legislation or anything required. For foreign currency holders precious metals would get more attractive.

Warren Buffet: "With political leaders showing little inclination to raise taxes, one sure way to pay for excess spending is to inflate the value of the currency, Buffett said. The biggest losers in a surge of inflation, he added, would include holders of bonds and other fixed-income assets.

I haven't had my taxes raised," said Buffett, "My guess is the ultimate price will be paid by a shrinkage of the value of the dollar."

Jim Sinclair and Martin Armstrong have said the next contact with gold at $1,000 which makes it its third attempt, pushes it through for good. From here on out, it's China versus the COMEX boys.

I vote with the guy who holds almost 2$ trillion in foreign reserves.
 By bluejay

05/08/2009  12:57PM

Gold's last is $915.10.

The US dollar looks like its months of recent strength are nearing a close. In today's activity the dollar is quite weak against the Euro and Cando. The Loonie is up 1.52% at .8682 and continues to advance against the sagging dollar. Overall, the Dollar Index if off 0.62 today at 83.21. For some past weeks it had found support at the 84 level.

I guess George Soros knew what he was doing by selling the dollar in the 85.00 to 86.00 zone and above recently. It was fairly easy to pick this up from a recent Bloomberg interview of him when he was asked the question, What do you think of the dollar? Soros' comment was, "No comment." To me, that meant that he was in the midst of a US dollar currency positioning operation.

Chosing whether he was buying or selling was, also, not too complicated. Was the dollar at a international public orientented top or bottom? Easy guess, a top.

With the dollar breaking recent support at the 84.00 level, this event is expected to be mirrored in the time ahead with a rising gold price. Yes, it is time for us to show the world our hidden and elusive gold.

I always enjoy reading Dave's and Rick's well thought out comments.
 By Dave I.

05/07/2009  11:53PM

That is better than taxing flatulent activity
 By Rick

05/07/2009  6:02PM

Two major problems: 1) our national resources are being rejected as potential pollution, which is a complete oxymoron when economic analysis proves how importation of oil is far more costly than allowing the free market to bring forth our own natural resource oil, and 2) the current administration is doing everything it can dream up to not only kill the free market economy in this country, but condemn any capitalist incentive to see it achieve.

China is laughing its ass off, along with every other country that knows that taxing volcanoes would be about as sensible as hog-tying our own natural resources.

Hey, what a great idea! My new bumper sticker: TAX A VOLCANO, THINK OF THE REVENUE
 By Dave I.

05/07/2009  5:00PM

The reason the dollar has remained strong is because of our gross domestic production of a free market and its reliability to remain stable backed by all of our national resources.
The Chinese are a command economy, more efficient, but less innovative for the individual to drive for success.
Then there is the old quote " He who has the most gold makes the rules" it is time for us to take the gold from the ground to display for the world to see.
 By bluejay

05/07/2009  10:53AM

Last on gold is $912.60.

/More on China/

U.S. Dollar, Yuan and the New Reserve Currency
Chinese are making small moves to get more and more insulation from the dollar.

By Vadim Pokhlebkin
Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:00:00 ET Email | Print | RSS | My Updates Bookmark and share It!

There has been a lot of talk lately about replacing the U.S. dollar as the world's reserve currency. Read these thoughts on this and another hot subject -- China's dependence on the dollar -- by Chris Carolan, the editor of Elliott Wave International's Sunday-Tuesday-Thursday Asian-Pacific Short Term Update. (Excerpted from the recent APSTU issues.)

...the Chinese have announced that they would like the world to establish a reserve currency alternative to the dollar, perhaps under the auspices of the IMF. The U.S. has responded (through Paul Volcker) that the Chinese have created their own predicament by not allowing the yuan to float higher. But we believe that the larger trends to watch are the inevitable leadership role that the Asian-Pacific markets will play in the next bull market as they have access to cheaper capital than the debt-stressed West.

We think that people who focus on the alleged Chinese problem of holding too many dollars miss the point. In the long run, they can reduce their new dollar positions, while the U.S. government is, through their recent actions especially, committing themselves to issuing greater and greater amounts of dollar debt. The Chinese can (and may) push themselves away from the table, but the U.S. does not have the luxury of that freedom.

The yuan, whose exchange rate is controlled, seems to be pushing higher within the boundaries of its restricted trading. [This] chart shows the dollar falling relative to the yuan.

(Sorry chart would not transfer)

How will the Chinese cut their exposure to the dollar over time? News accounts tend to focus on one big event, such as the possibility of a new reserve currency to replace the dollar. But in all likelihood, the Chinese will be making a series of moves, each one gaining them a little bit of insulation from the dollar. If they can protect one hundred billion (US$) here and another one hundred billion there, pretty soon they will have cut their dollar exposure significantly.

We highlighted one such action in our recent discussion of China’s move into owning more resources as a way of diversifying out of the dollar. Now comes news of China executing more currency swaps, where they trade yuan for a local currency, thereby allowing that trading partner to use the yuan in future trade with China. These swaps then remove the need for dollars as an intermediary exchange between trading partners. The Chinese have signed six such swap agreements since November totaling $95 billion. The latest swap agreement is with Argentina.

Step by incremental step, the Chinese are solving their dollar problem, or at least ameliorating it. Those looking for that one big news event to signal the dollar’s irrelevance may be missing the trend, though such an event may still occur further out in time
 By bluejay

05/06/2009  10:53PM

Last on gold is $913.80 in Asian markets tonight.

The most significant development for gold has been the recent announcement by China that they have secretly added gold to their reserves over the past few years with a well placed official stating that this trend should continue.

China for some time now has been bartering off US dollars for natural resources around the world. Since they hold large quantities of US Treasuries they have to be delicate in their divestiture of them. As they slide out of some of their Treasuries, it is at the same time they're maintaining the posture that they continue to buy them but overall their holdings are being scaled down.

China is preparing for their future and it doesn't involve the US dollar being the world's reserve currency. China is increasing its central bank hoard of gold in preparation for the Yuan becoming the world's reserve currency within 20 years or sooner.

The bottom line is that China has declared war against those who are manipulating gold's price to prop up their ailing fiat currencies as they have being since Bretton Woods and before.

It appears that China, as the number one producer of gold, is no longer willing to stand idly by watching fiat central bank manipulation of the gold price. One has to only recall that it wasn't too long ago that China suggested that the IMF sell its entire holdings of gold. Not only is China keeping all their domestic gold in country along with nibbling here and there on the international market, they want all the IMF's gold. One can only guess what amount of gold they are looking for.

Our central bank has manipulated gold where it stands today, well below where their own skewed CPI figures dictates it should be somewhere in the neighborhood of $2500 an ounce just to keep up with the erosion of our money's real worth.

The paper products shorting of gold at the COMEX by the bullion banks is just a matter of time before it all becomes history and blows up in the end. The supposed largest central bank holdings of gold by the US and Germany may very well be challenged in the not too distant future. It's my belief that these two countries have known the jig is up for the past 18 months and are scampering to get the gold back quietly. Has anyone wondered where all the scrap gold sales that amounted to about 500 tons went last year? Who is running all these offers on TV to buy the public's old gold jewelry for "quick cash" during this severe recession?

Let the games begin!

China wants to buy more gold

Posted Apr 24th 2009 6:20PM by Connie Madon
Filed under: International markets, China, Commodities, Financial Crisis

In rare public announcement, China has revealed its gold holdings, which are 1,054 tons up from 600 tons in 2002. Why is China's gold pot of concern to us? Well, for one thing China has been moving away from the US dollar as part of their reserve holdings since 2005. China is increasingly worried about the world economies and wants to protect itself against any deepening of the world financial crisis.

China is also asserting itself on the world stage. Chinese leaders feel that the country's gold holdings must be increased because of the size of China'a economy and the strengthening of its currency.

In a policy statement Hou Huimin, vice general secretary of the China Gold Association said that China should build its reserves to 5,000 tons. He feels that China should hold more gold than any other country because of China's international status and because of the financial crisis. He further said: "The financial crisis means the US dollar's value is changing fast and it may retreat from being the international reserve currency. If that happens, whoever holds the gold will be at an advantage."
 By bluejay

05/05/2009  10:55PM

Last on gold is $902.40

Effectively, Venezuela is reducing their gold exports by requiring the central bank to increase its purchases of the metal. Venezuela joins China in building up their gold reserves.

 By bluejay

05/03/2009  1:44PM

Gold $885.80
Silver $12.50
Gold/Silver Ratio 70.86
Gold/Xau Ratio 7.36
Canadian Dollar $0.8435

The Canadian Dollar's last sale is provided as an incentive for consideration to follow its action in the months ahead or take action as a result of its recently completed bottom formation against the US dollar when it advanced over $0.83. Smart money will be aggressively trading in their US dollars for Canadian dollars in purchasing Canadian gold orientented securities on any renewed strength in gold. In the mean time, these securities should have strong bids going forward as a result of the US dollar going negative against the Loonie.

Your secured cash wealth can be moved from US Treasuries into Canadian Government bonds with a great probability of success. Thus, avoiding continuing debasement of the US currency which the government likes to call inflation using their Mickey Mouse formula for it.

Just read in this mornings paper that Social Security increases for inflation adjustment will stop for the next two years. Whatever the cooked up reason is for this, it sucks. I guess the bankers are more important to them than are elderly which should require more respect than the government is willing to extend to them in their obvious time of need due to this cruel recession. Cut our Social Security inflation adjustments increases and keep handing out our IOU's to the banks when they are the big screw-ups is not the way to make friends.

There appears to be a floor in gold market at $860 as a result of China's declared intention to increase their gold reserves in a boston.com carried report from Shanghai/Beijing Reuters published on April 24, 2009. China revealed that it has been secretly buying gold. Currently, they hold 1,054 tons or $30.9 billion at current levels. Considering the Chinese hold nearly $2 trillion in their reserves account, they will have no trouble coming up with cash for more purchases anytime that they feel the metal is underpriced. The most significant aspect of their announcement is that a new trend has begun to acquire the royal metal by a potential sizable buyer.

Why did China ever make this disclosure if they are still buyers? It's quite apparent that it was intended as a stern warning to US monetary officials to get their house in order, or else. Reuters reports that Mr. Hou Huimin, vice general secretary of the China Gold Association, said China should build its reserves to 5,000 tons.

It will be a most interesting scenario in the months and years ahead witnessing China buying more gold for cash as opposed to the bullion bankers playing with the gold price on the COMEX with paper instruments or mirrors. The bottom line is that gold exports from China will cease to exist in the years ahead while they are temporarily the biggest world producing country. I say temporarily because China's gold deposits that can be mined at a profit at prevailing prices are only good for another 6 years or so. Some analysts say it could be as long as 14 years. Massively Putting the drill bit to the ground will tell the final story.

The silver market at $12.50 an ounce is still recovering from the damage done to it by some US banks in shorting it from the later part of last year from just under $20 all the way down to just about $8. The CFTC is a shameful outfit when they turned their heads while miners and silver holders were getting robbed blind during the beginnings of the banking crisis. The CFTC has a habit of listening only to the short manipulators and not the boni fided cash buyers.

As an example of this, years ago when Warren Buffett began acquiring a big silver position through a Connecticut broker and squeezing the shorts they all went crying and complained to the CFTC. The CFTC tracked down the broker buyer and demanded to know who they were representing. The buyer, Buffett, instructed his broker not to give up his name. The end result was that Buffett sold his silver forcing down prices in a hurry and packed his money bags and moved his buying operation to London where he acquired a $1 billion position and left it there, far away from the hands of the CFTC and its friends. When I complained through my Congressional representative concerning the bank's manipulative activity in the silver market last year, I have yet to see any regulatory action or a response to the complaint. I guess we know who is working for whom.

The Gold/Silver Ratio at 70.86 is still acting in favor of gold over silver. For the ratio to turn positive for silver against gold it has to spend some chart time below the 69.00 mark, then we'll see.

The Gold/XAU Ratio is in neutral territory at the moment. Above the 7.60 level it supports a better relative strength for gold while below 7.00 supports the case to hold gold shares versus the bullion.
 By bluejay

04/15/2009  3:43PM

Gold $890.80 UP $0.20
Silver $12.77 UP $0.01

Martin Armstrong's April 9th, 2009 commentary is available from the provided link below.

Mr. Armstrong's words give a surprising better insight into a Goldman Sach's conspiracy to control world financial markets along with his explanation why is was sent to prison and why he remains there.

The informative article is a real eye opener and may shake your world of beliefs but it is worth your time.

 By bluejay

04/14/2009  1:29AM

Gold $897.70 UP $5.10 versus today's NY close

Memories of 2005 flashed through my memory today when I learned of a Barron's article attacking another gold related company. This time the news media went after Jim Sinclair's company, Tanzania Royalty Exploration.

In 2005 the L.A. Times attacked our company and Barron's, again, Royal Gold. It was just a matter of a few days ago when Mr. Sinclair started drawing reference, again, to the thrashing a Barron's editorial gave Royal Gold. The source for that publication came from an entity that had an interest in seeing Royal Gold's stock trade lower which the article facilitated. Was the Sinclair attack coincidence or planned by Barron's? I guess you can take you pick but I vote for the later.

The article, All That Glitters Is Not Gold by Vito J. Rancanelli, was basically an attack dog stunt something that Original Sixteen To One shareholders know about, too well. Mr Rancanelli unfortunately had his name penned to the story but more importantly for speculative curiosity, who pulled on his strings for the hatchet job?

Most of the media in this country it seems has nothing nice to say about gold or the related companies. I remember some years back mentioning that the Boston Globe in an article trashed gold with some wild talk about "what ifs." Mr. Rancanelli's review did more than that, it may have set a Guinness Book of World Records for the most negatives ever submitted with a business report.

The writer started out by stating, "no revenue, no earnings, no proven gold and accounting issues" and it got worse. He attacked Mr. Sinclair for selling his company's stock 50 or so times last year while at the same time participating in special offering which brought money into the company.

I see Mr. Sinclair's motives as being genuine in avoiding the investment banks which are notorious for driving down the share prices following secondaries. I view Jim as a talented innovator.

Keeping the investment bankers out of the picture prevents them from getting their hands on warrants to be used as stop gaps for financial protection if their short operation fails. If they obtain a pile of warrants watch out! I have seen this happen far too often and in the end shareholders always suffer watching their stock tank later. In Mr. Sinclair's selling, he was just rolling over the shares to the market and keeping the bankers from performing their demonic act thus supporting his shareholder's investments.

Although last year, Mr. Sinclair was no match for the two or three US banks that were allowed to freighten holders of precious metals and the related stocks when they went on a planned and methodical bear raid looting spree.

It's really kind of sad for shareholders when slanted stories can be so vicious.
My guess is that if you own gold directly or indirectly, you will ALWAYS be subject to attack by the owners and supporters of any fiat money system. So, be prepared.
 By bluejay

04/12/2009  9:44PM

Gold $886.90 Up $7.70
Silver $ 12.55 Up $0.22
Gold/Silver Ratio 7.22
Gold/XAU Ratio 70.67

For the past six years the smart way to buy gold is to place mental scale down buy orders in for coins or small bars starting from a 12% retracement below the metal's previous high. Trading gold is not advocated as it can drive you nuts. Recently, it was mentioned to buy gold when it was off nearly 13% from a previous high just over $1000 at $865.

In 2003 gold reacted from its previous high down 20%, 2004 about 13%, 2005 no 12% reaction, 2006 it sold off 23%, 2007 no 12% reaction, 2008 it sold off 32% and so far this year it has been off the most at about 13% at $860 with a last price of $886.90.

Jim Rogers was interviewed on Bloomberg TV tonight and said for a period of 1 year he would prefer holding oil as opposed to gold. The reason, the IMF wants to sell gold to shore up their finances.

George Soros was interviewed on the same station by Kathleen Hayes and was asked what he thought of the US dollar? Mr Soros said, "I have no opinion." It sounds to me that Mr Soros is either actively shorting the dollar or buying it. Earlier in the interview he said the extended rally in the stock market is a bear market rally.

Mr. Martin Armstrong's view is that if the rally is contained below 8400 on the DOW then the possibility of a waterfall decline is still possible. Mr Armstrong has stated that a move to the 4200 level is expected if 8400 or lower is the reaction high on this good rally. If that decline starts it may encourage foreigners to sell stocks and repatriate their funds somewhere else thus weakening the dollar to some degree.

More than likely based on Mr. Soros' negative opinion on the stock market it appears he has been shorting the dollar and not buying it. If the dollar declines gold should advance. The dollar has been having chart troubles in the 85.00 to 86.00 range and may be setting up for an intermediate decline. We'll just have to wait and see what happens.

It's fun guessing and second guessing to add a little excitement to the gold picture as it beats having your gold locked up at the bank which is not too much fun. When this gold decline is over it will be another trip to the bank for another deposit.
 By Rick

04/10/2009  5:10PM

Surprised, but due and worthy. After all, the Original Sixteen to One is a real gold mine...
 By studbkr

04/09/2009  4:45PM

Additional note: I'm quite surprised that Sinclair was watching this forum (or one of his readers pointed it out)
 By studbkr

04/09/2009  4:43PM

FYI: this morning, Jim Sinclair on www.jsmineset.com quoted BlueJay's January 31st posting about RGLD. There may have been a jump in web traffic to this site today...
 By bluejay

04/08/2009  9:58AM

Producers vs. Explorers

If gold is a low risk investment during the Kondratieff winter, should we buy the gold producers or the exploration companies? Let's examine the 'pros' and 'cons' of each of them.

Gold Producing Companies:
· Investment grade. Large Market Caps-appropriate for investment funds.
· Cash flow via production.
· Excellent liquidity.
· Share prices generally rise faster than the price of gold itself.

· Depleting their resources through production. Difficulty finding sufficient reserves to maintain production at current levels; e.g.
Newmont produces 7.2 million ounces each year. Approximately 9 million ounces is required to replace this production.
· Hierarchal management-slow to make decisions.
· Exploration subject to committee review and budgetary constraints.
· Limited exploration since 1998.
· Only a small number of companies to choose from.

Junior Exploration Companies:
· Responsible for 70% of discoveries.
· Growing their gold.
· Quick response management.
· Innovative geologists; prepared to see the unconventional.
· The onset of the Kondratieff winter suggests the largest bull market in gold in the entire cycle. In that environment share prices
rise faster than those of their production counterparts.
· A major discovery positively impacts the share prices of most exploration companies.
· An ability to release regular news in progress.
· Management usually owns a large stake in the company and has a vested interest in achieving positive results on the behalf of all shareholders.

· Management not trusted - think Bre-X
· Viewed as very high risk investments.
· Investors don't understand news releases, because they are usually not geologists-and are unable to evaluate a discovery in progress.
· Poor liquidity; small market caps-not suitable for most investment funds.
· Difficulty in raising money; major dilution at low share prices.

Evaluating Juniors:
The key is Management. The Long Wave approach, developed by my team at Bolder Investment Partners is subjective but still useful.

A Simple Evaluation System:
Management: 30 Points
· History
· Integrity
· Technical skills
· Management skills
· Relationships
· Ownership in the company

Properties: 20 Points
· Grass roots/discovery/gold in the ground
· Access/Power/Water

Blue Sky: 15 Points
· How big could this be?

Political Risk: 15 Points · A, B, C, or F
· A = Quebec
· F = Venezuela, Ecuador

Market Capitalization: 15 Points
· Comparative values
· Value of gold in the ground

Promotion: 5 Points
· How well does the company get the word out?
· Conservative versus flashy

I much prefer investing in juniors versus seniors in a gold bull market, because:

· There is significantly more upside price potential, because of the leverage.
· Easy to be selective. There are plenty to choose from. Follow the management.
· Exciting to follow progress; discovery-resources-reserves.
· Management is usually dedicated to enhancing shareholder value. It wins, too.

So there you have it, I believe that gold at this point in the Kondratieff cycle is a low risk investment and good junior gold mining shares are arguably an even lower risk than their senior producing counterparts. Please direct any questions, comments or queries to:

Ian Gordon, The Long Wave Analyst
Bolder Investment Partners, Ltd
Phone: 604-742-3200
Email : igordon@bolder.net

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | Page 7 | Page 8 | Page 9 | Page 10 | Page 11 | Page 12 | Page 13 | Page 14 | Page 15 | Page 16 | Page 17 | Page 18 | Page 19 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 22 | Page 23 | Page 24 | Page 25 | Page 26 | Page 27 | Page 28 | Page 29 | Page 30 | Page 31 | Page 32 | Page 33 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 36 | Page 37 | Page 38 | Page 39 | Page 40 | Page 41 | Page 42 | Page 43 | Page 44 | Page 45 | Page 46 | Page 47 | Page 48 | Page 49 | Page 50 | Page 51 | Page 52 | Page 53 | Page 54 | Page 55 | Page 56 | Page 57 | Page 58 | Page 59 | Page 60 | Page 61 | Page 62 | Page 63 | Page 64 ]


© 2021 Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc.
PO Box 909
Alleghany, California 95910

(530) 287-3223      
(530) 287-3455

      Gold Sales:  

(530) 287-3540


Design & development by
L. Kenez