April 23, 2017 

Another U.S. precious metals miner goes foreign


Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 ]

 By Dave I.

03/22/2010  3:41AM

Being aware of the lack of freedom and the continuous assault on those rights by an intrusive government trying to be the solution to all problems of humanity has taken away our freedom of responsibility to our selves. We as a people do we want this freedom back? We have grown complacent.
 By bluejay

03/21/2010  8:21PM

Rick, you speak for the common man. Dave, I used to be a true believer like yourself. The Constitution is methodically being dismandled, make no mistake about that. I'm hearing from respected people that the health care plan that is supposedly going to be passed tonight with more people against it, will take in money early while delaying benefits for four years. Who does this benefit? It benefits the the governement in shoring up a faltering Social Security Program as well as it injects money into a failing Medicare system.

I'm with Rick, our elected so-called public officials have sold us all down the river.

Talk about the Constitution, it has done Mr. Martin Armstrong abolutely no good. He remains in jail, with it starting with a contempt charge. Imagine being in jail for five years or so only on comtempt charges? Regardless, whether there was a REAL cause of action or not. It could happen to you.

The coviction rate in this country by federal prosecutors is nearly 98.5%. Seem high? It's the take here that certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution have been denied in some of those cases. The high conviction rates are even in excess of the ones handed out during the Spanish Inquisition and during Hitler's regime. Don't permit the politicians, government or the TV do your thinking for you. Think for yourself.

If you really want to get educated, I suggest going to the http://www.martinarmstrong.org website and read all of Mr. Armstrong's writings. Mr. Armstrong may be the smartest person on the planet. I looked at his latest hand written thoughts tonight from March 12, 2010 and here are a few excerpts:

"We are entering Phase II of the debt crisis moving now from mortgages into commercial property and headed directly in a Sovereign debt crisis. I have warned that the DOW will make new highs and I do not see a 1929 collapse in stocks. My great fear is debt. The amounts of money in bonds relative to stocks is 10:1."

"What made the the Great Depression so great was not the stock decline, it was the 1931 Sovergeign Debt Defaults that wiped out all those who thought they were smart escaping stocks, they lost everything in bonds."

"Do not get caught up in this Doomday stuff that stocks go to 1929 levels, so buy bonds. This is the worst possible outcome you will run into. Read Herbert Hoovers's Memoirs on the 1931 Crisis. Then you will know what to expect and how capital really moves. You will also know more than most governments."
 By Dave I.

03/18/2010  10:19PM

A man,Rick. The Constitution does protect our freedom. As defined in the 9th Amendment of the Constitution: " The Enumeration of the Constitution of Certain Rights Shall not be Construed to Deny or Disparage others Retained by the People."
It has already been determined by the Supreme Court, that Those rights enumerated in the constitution are to be viewed as free as possible to the protection of the rights as defined by each as stated. I.E.: Freedom of speech, is interpreted form " Congress shall make no Law Abridging the Freedom of Speech," This is the right to Free Speech, It is the 9th Amendment that makes it a right which provides a duty to interpret the constitution.
We the people have other rights: the right of an expectant mother to give birth to a child. This is aright of humanity, it is not an enumerated right, it is an expected right of people. This is protected by the 9th Amendment.
 By Rick

03/18/2010  7:57PM

Yes, the "United States will remain a difficult place to invest" because not a day goes by when Congress decides to pass a new law. WHY!!!!!??????

Every new law is a new regulation...no new laws will insure freedom and that Freedom will ring.

All the rest of the new laws are shackles.

Yesterday I woke up with enough laws. Far too many for yesterday, by the way. I respect freedom and don't need a new law to tell me to be lawful.

These a-holes live to pass new laws! Why? Go Home!!!! Every new law is a restriction on freedom.

Freedom rings with the truth that embodies the honor: truth, bourne with a handshake and the word we give each other. Freedom is not written through a restrictive process, a shameful existence, but with the honor of trust and truth.

Government: STOP! You are not the reason we are free. Our Constitution, God and Country trump your sleazy motives, and we know it already.

More laws = less freedom. We are not on the side of less freedom. And you know it. We are stronger.

Government, GO HOME and stay there.
 By The Big R

03/18/2010  11:14AM

Behre Dolbear just came out with its Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment, where not to Invest. Canada, Australia, Chile and Mexico where at the top. "The United States will remain a difficult country to develop new projects and could deteriorate further depending on additional new regulations and taxes". India and Brazil also look good.
 By The Big R

03/04/2010  12:49PM

Yesterday one of my mining partners had a conversation with a Nevada lawyer who at times represents several of Nevada's largest gold mining companies. During the conversation the lawyer made the statement "you know Barrick and Newmont just want to mine what they have and get out of the United States". Many of us believe this but had never heard an insider admit to it. Considering the way the US has treated them I think they will be better off. Newmont and Barrick presently have 7 years reserves. There goes 60 thousand +$30/hr jobs.
 By Dave I.

03/01/2010  4:53PM

Why??? Is only open to speculation. During a tour through Nevada last year, the landscape was a planted garden of white tubular claim stakes. Thousands and thousands of mining claims have been staked.
By the allowed number of claims that can be staked per person by the 1872 mining law, that to hold them has been cheap for the claimant.
Now with this increase in tax per claim, it will become exponentially more expensive for the small miner and the speculative claim holder, looking to hold and sell a claim. This would be a bad time for this due to the present economic recession thus causing stress to the small claim holder.
Who benefit? The big mining companies do, and the state government do.
The big mining companies are flush with profits, but limited on staking new claim. They hold to many to originate new mining claims.
So the next thing they can do to increase their claim holdings is to buy up existing claims who are unfunded to develop. These existing small claim holders would be willing to sell cheap to get out from the tax loss for holding such claims. This higher tax is beneficial to a monopoly of greed.
The State of Nevada is the holder of the greatest mineral wealth of our nation as well as geothermal wealth for energy needs. There will probably be a need for this open land to support Solar energy farms, and wind farms. With the possible economic development for National lands of Nevada, he who controls it gets the most.
 By Michael Miller

03/01/2010  10:38AM

Last weekend the Nevada legislature passed a proposal to raise the tax on unpatented mining claims ten times. It amounts to an increase per claim from $12.50 to $125.00. All unpatented mining claim owners were hit by a series of increases that raised the fee just to hold onto a mining claim that has gone on for two decades. Now each claim holder must pony up $140 to the federal BLM to maintain ownership in the right to spend his money looking for ore. The Nevada governor, Jim Gibbons has indicated he will go for an increase. The question is how much?

There are near 14,000 miners employed in Nevada. They produce new wealth for Nevada and America. The equipment purchased supports American companies throughout the country. The wages are mostly locally spent in the mining towns. What will be the fall out from this legislation?

For years Congress has had legislators pushing to rewrite the 1872 Mine Act. A key change is a proposed royalty on gross production. A figure as high as 8% is proposed. What will become of American investment in exploration on US soil? How will front the money to develop a mine in the United States? Where will the capital come from to take a property into production?

Interestingly, the Nevada newspaper that reported on the tax increase said, “Miners agree to increased fee on mining claims.” This means the big dogs: Newmont and Barrick. Why?
 By studbkr

06/24/2009  12:32PM

Do you have photos and GPS coordinates? (I'm not a potential buyer, but I'm curious)
 By Michael Miller

05/28/2009  1:56PM

For fifteen years our company has been excited about the gold deposit known as the “Brown Bear”. Over 500,000 ounces of gold were produced from its claims (total patented acres: 580.18). What sticks out is that little development occurred below the drain tunnel. Interpret this as less costly mining in future development time and expenses and a mine owner's dream.

The Brown Bear is the home of a ghost town…Deadwood. Deadwood had a school, a post office, saloons, churches, businesses and homes. And the spirit remains. Ray Wittkopp and I are familiar with the old workings, geology and concepts for future mining. It is a great bet, even when the gold price was half what it is today.

Well, yesterday I listed the property with Coldwell Banker. The price is $1,323,000 (surface rights), a price suggested by the local broker. Our Company needs working capital along with debt reduction. Since the gold collection did not sell, our Trinity County property becomes next in line to raise money.

This northern part of California has rugged features that are accessible yet hard to find in one location: world class fishing, boating hiking, wilderness, unyuppiefied communities, a short drive to the Pacific ocean, redwoods, and even golfing. It even has a commercial airport about an hour away.

After speaking these glowing words about the gold potential of the Brown Bear, another fact is the Sixteen to One deposit and its potential is unrivaled anywhere in the world. Therefore, the Brown Bear is now available for someone else to take a shot at getting some gold. This became possible because as I entered the real estate office, I thought about our awaiting plans in Alleghany and decided to also offer the mineral rights to the listing. I love the Bear but the gold here in Alleghany is at our finger tips.

It is difficult for anyone to appraise the mineral value of deposits like the Sixteen to One or Brown Bear so again I listened to the broker. His estimate was significantly lower than mine; however again I thought about our plans in Alleghany, our expectations and the need to goose this operation into action, so agreed that the “mineral rights may be included for a purchase price of $2,318,000”

There is an ancient saying that if the deal sounds to good to be true, it probably isn’t. Adequate data exists that supports another rarely used saying that if a deal sounds to good to be true and is, take it with a smile. Such is the situation now available at the Brown Bear.

So either with or without the mineral rights, these 580.18 acres on four parcels will have someone walking away with a smile. Let’s find a buyer right now!
 By Michael Miller

04/30/2009  4:42PM

Parts of the world are moving to improve their GDP with natural resource development. China is a global leader when it comes to gold. Its mines have stepped up investment, which translates into ounces of bullion. It also has been active in a different way with gold.

China became the #5 holder of gold as purchases continued the past quarter. As China moves toward more bilateral trade agreements, it recently negotiated six major contracts where the Chinese Yaun is the medium of exchange. Move over, dollar. The Yaun has the weight of en ever growing supply of gold behind it.

As an aside, when I negotiated the long-term lease in 1983 with Lucky Chance Mining, I included a gold choice as well as a dollar choice payment for royalty payments. At one time such agreements between private parties was illegal in the USA. Will Americans be better off or worse if the dollar loses its international reputation of value?
 By Dave I.

04/07/2009  8:36PM

The hearing for California State Senate Bill 670, is scheduled to happen April 28, 2009.
 By Dave I.

04/07/2009  6:05PM

We who dredge our rivers need the help of all those who want to protect the right of mining
here in California

“The Enumeration in the constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” : this is the 9th Amendment of the United States Constitution.

This means that the rights identified as written are not the only rights we as a people have. This also means that those making laws in government do not restrict their view of our rights as only those written in the constitution. This gives the responsibility to the legislature in making law, to first evaluate the necessity for the law, that it does not take away these other rights of the people. We have identified these other rights as “FREEDOM” . The freedom of the people is in-fact protected by our constitution.
Sb670 is written to stop river dredging, when in fact river dredging has held and still holds the respect of people as a right and legal method of the miner to retrieve the valuable metal from the river bottom. For the legislature to stop this activity with out evidence of damage to the river eco-system is a false cause to protect the environment. It does not justify such restriction of the peoples right to dredge our river bottoms.
This is an attack on the rights of the people based on false cause and a clear disrespect by certain people in our State legislature who falsely represent their constituents and their obligation to defend the constitutional rights of the people. Please help by standing up to those that would destroy our freedom, and tell your state representative of your objection to SB 670, and to vote against this threat to our freedom.
 By Michael Miller

03/12/2009  4:52PM

John Muir is mentioned (below) as a beacon of light for George Miller and other like-minded Americans and members of Congress. As you read the FORUM entries below and consider whether to make a pro-active effort to squash ignorance, go back to an entry under the topic “Correspondence from the President” on Page 6, written on 06/03/2003, which contains a lengthy and poignant story written by John Muir.

It isn’t too long but full of the real John Muir, a keen observer, not the altered Mr. Muir, altered to give credibility to those who make powerful attacks on the natural resource extraction industries. One sentence goes like this:

“ The importance of these ancient gravels as gold fountains is well known to miners. The hills have been cut and scalped, and every gorge and gulch and valley torn to pieces and disemboweled, expressing a fierce and desperate energy hard to understand. Still, any kind of effort making is better than inaction, and there is something sublime in seeing men working in dead earnest at anything, pursuing an object with glacier-like energy and persistence. Most of the pioneer miners are sleeping now, their wild day done, while the few survivors linger languidly in the washed-out gulches or sleepy village like harried bees around the ruins of their beehive. ”

Ah, John, you wrote so well, these thoughts and observations in 1894. Wish you were here today.
 By bluejay

03/12/2009  8:37AM

I just gave my Congresswoman, Lynn Woolsey, an earfull. This should be the bare minimum for each concerned people to do, directly complain to your people in Congress.
 By Dave I.

03/06/2009  9:02PM

George Miller is the number one tree huger in congress. His district includes the ancestral home of John Miur. The ground zero for environmental advocacy with the Sierra Club and The Wilderness Society.
Geo Miller is one the most powerful congressmen in the House of representatives. He is a chubby guy and looks like a cross between Teddy Roosevelt and Santa Claus. He is a bad foe to have against you and dedicated to everything environmental.
Vallejo is part of his district, and was very active in the up front efforts to keep Mare Island Ship Yard form being closed. We heard later that behind the seen he supported the closure. I am not sure there is any truth to this statement other than here say.
I sincerely doubt that George Miller would represent a sympathetic representative to mining rights and Liberty. He is the one who is writing legislation to condemn the liberty and rights of mining in our nation.
 By Dick Davis

03/06/2009  6:45PM

George Miller may have kept a casino out of Contra Costa. I'm not familiar with Mr. Miller or his agenda. But there is an Indian Casino in San Pablo.

Tribal Organization: Lytton Band of Pomo Indians

13255 San Pablo Ave
San Pablo, CA 94806
 By martin newkom

03/06/2009  1:53PM

I believe Geo. Miller reps.
a SF Bay Area District inclu-
ding Contra Coast Co. He kept
an Indian Casino out of that
area as it would compete with
a cardroom he was involved in.
 By Michael Miller

03/04/2009  1:00PM

Let me save you some time in responding to the Rahall legislation detailed below.

I called to open a dialog on the subject of why and how did Rep George Miller decide to co-sponsor this legislation. After three transfers and about ten minutes I was told Miller’s personal office number is (202) 225-2095. Call this number, explain that you want to learn his justifications for co-sponsoring. He or she will listen and ask for your e-mail address, which is how his office handles this type of request. I expect to hear from him.

A different Miller employee suggested I call the Natural Resources Sub Committee, ask for energy and mineral resources (202 225-6065). He also recommended going on internet to find its members and seek out the one most representative of my district. I said that nine co-sponsors were Californians and eight other states were also represented; however natural resources are a countrywide issue important to every American regardless of our state borders.

I also picked Rep Patrick Kennedy to contact. Being smarter it took six minutes but I got a person’s e-mail address plus I left a phone message to Ben Kershaw, who handles my type of question. Rhode Island is unlike California in significant ways but this bill will adversely affect its Americans who are likely far removed from gold and other mineral producers.
 By Rick

03/03/2009  6:00PM

Well, we've received "change" ....thanks to the ignorant.

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 ]


© 2017 Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc.
PO Box 909
Alleghany, California 95910

(530) 287-3223      
(530) 287-3455

      Gold Sales:  

(530) 287-3540


Design & development by
L. Kenez