July 5, 2022 

Miner's Health - Shareholders Health


Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 ]

 By bluejay

09/11/2021  10:12AM

 By bluejay

09/10/2021  4:33PM

Does anyone suspect there is something wrong? I do.

I listened to our president on TV last night state, “the Covid 19 shots have been approved by the FDA.” This is false, they have not approved them but only extended the emergency approval for the drug dealers to keep making it, as some call it, the poison.

According to Clif High from a usawatchdog.com interview a few nights ago he said, a lot fewer have taken the shot than we are being told.
Mr. High gives general information that we are not being told in the general media that is shocking.

The following was released today.


Robert F. Kennedy Jr
"Biden’s efforts to coerce federal workers + those who have elected to remain unvaccinated is clearly in violation of Nuremberg Code, which has been incorporated into U.S. federal and state law. This is a sad day for ethics + rule of law.” — Mary Holland

What is troubling is the use of the word vaccinate. Vaccines usually take 10 years to receive approval from the FDA.
What the president is calling a vaccine does not scientifically exist and is a misnomer. What people are receiving is an experimental drug, not a vaccine. Why it has not been crowned a vaccine Is because the FDA had not deemed it safe for human use. In the meantime, it is in use under an emergency proclamation granted the drug dealers as it has been determined that there are no treatments to combat this so called virus which continues with its variants which some doctors say are coming from the injections.

There is mounting evidence from many doctors and medical organizations that this so called vaccine has many side effects and is killing people.

Why the big push to lie to everyone?

The people behind this big push continue to hide behind the curtain like the cowards they are while their little puppets keep the push going forward in support of the agenda.

One only has to do their own research
concerning who raised Bill Gates and what type of mindset they had and maybe you can put the pieces together to what is going on today in the European countries, especially in Australia, Canada and with the recent big push here.

Do your own research and as Gerald Celente says, “think for yourself.“
 By bluejay

09/07/2021  4:23PM

Arizona Attorney General: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for City Employees Is Unconstitutional
 By bluejay

09/02/2021  1:42PM

FAA & FDA Misled Public

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Aug. 13 ruling in favor of Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and other petitioners is a win of historic proportions.

To capitalize on this landmark win — and to protect your family, our communities and the futures of all our children — CHD is launching a campaign to inform elected officials on the federal, state and local levels about the court’s decision, and to encourage them to take immediate action to ensure objective and independent review of the scientific evidence.

You can help by contacting your elected officials. Click here to take part in CHD’s campaign to legislators.

The court ruled that the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) 2019 decision that its decades-old guidelines for 5G and wireless technology protects public health is capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based as it pertains to the non-cancer harms.

This means the current guidelines regarding wireless technology do not protect public health.

ORDER TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'
The case revealed how the FCC and U.S. Food and Drug Administration have misled the public to believe that the FCC’s safety guidelines are based on rigorous review of the science.

In fact, over the past 25 years, no proper review of the non-cancer scientific evidence has ever been conducted, despite thousands of studies showing substantial evidence of harm, including to children.

Until this decision came down, the FCC’s guidelines had provided the government safety seal of approval for 5G and wireless deployment.

Now that the judges’ decision has confirmed this seal is not evidence-based, the FCC’s current guidelines cannot be used as an assurance of safety for smart devices and wireless infrastructure
 By bluejay

09/02/2021  8:54AM

George Soros has given the Gavin Newsom people $1,000,000 to keep him in office.

Gates and Soros have teamed up with Klaus Schwab within the World Economic Forum(WEF) to change the world for their greedy money making motives.

Thes people want to take down our country and for folks who doubt it, you should get an interest into checking out the facts.

Never in the history of the world has so much money been concentrated within so few. Gates and Soros are freaks and they are after your wealth and are they ruthless.

Keep Soros out of California.
 By bluejay

08/31/2021  8:09PM

Yes, well stated.

Gavin Newsom fails at forest management because it has no political currency for him, that's one reason why he must go. Who is counting all the animal and bird deaths and human suffering the Dixie fire has caused?
Poor forest management by Newsom has in addition caused failing health of all the people in its wake including my grandchildren in Sparks, Nevada. The sweet little Ken doll is a killer and is as stupid as they come. This is the same guy that gave China $1 billion for a large mask order when masks are made here in the u.s. by 100's of people.

Brandon Collins an expert on forest management says California has failed at properly managing forests. The governor is a pretty political freak that is responsible for destroying its resources and life.

The following is being submitted for those who might not know,

(George) Soros funneled $1 million to defund-the-police efforts as the country faced a violent crime spike this summer.

Soros is one of the top members of the World Economic Forum, as is Bill Gates, who seem to be intent in redesigning your world with their vast sums of money.

08/31/2021  4:47PM

Thanks Bluejay.
Miners' health is important.

Alleghany woke up this morning to its first blue sky in months. Two large fires surround Sierra County, but winds pushed smoke eastward.

Fix the problems that can be fixed.Health! Health of our national forests should be the Headlines across America.

CLEAR THE UNDER-STORY.Ignorance has provided fuel for California's fires. What about funding fuel reduction? Whether elected or employed state, county and federal public servants make it happen. Ignorance is one enemy to this solution. Are there other enemies?
 By bluejay

08/25/2021  5:17PM

Dr. Peter McCullough Tells RFK, Jr.: ‘The Vaccines Are Failing’

On the “RFK, Jr. The Defender Podcast,” Dr. Peter McCullough discussed a new study by the Oxford University Clinical Research Group and how the Pfizer’s vaccine, at 17% to 42% efficacy, doesn't meet the regulatory standard of 50% efficacy for vaccines.
 By bluejay

08/24/2021  9:25AM

Saying So Doesn't Make It So

by Martin Armstrong

The Fake News that FDA Approved the Vaccines is Made Clear in the Letter

FDA Letter Final_Pfizer LOA to issue with BLA approval 08.23.21_v2

The FDA did not approve the vaccines but extended the Emergency Use of the vaccines. They are also trying very hard to have agencies force employers to compel everyone to vaccinate but at the same time leaving themselves as an escape clause who they can return to claiming they never approved the vaccines beyond emergency use.

This is getting really questionable as to why they are forcing vaccines that clearly do not work and CANNOT work for as long as COVID exists in animals, it will constantly evolve and mutate just like the seasonal flu that sometimes comes from Birds or even Swine. The real question is WHY are we being lied to for what is the real purpose of the vaccines? They obviously do not care about the Great Unwashed, they prefer to thin the herd.
 By bluejay

08/18/2021  3:07PM

This is a wakeup call to owners of the Company.

Dr. Byram W. Bridle, PHD

By The London Times

An audio from a radio show there in which Dr. Bridle spoke disclosed that scientists behind the Covid 19 "Vaccine" made a terrible mistake.

According to the Doctor, who cites a brand new peer reviewed research study out of Japan "They made a mistake - they thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, only to discover it is a toxin, that can travel to many organs of the body, causing severe damage."

The Company has an abundance of conifers growing on its property. Steeped conifer needles can make a tea than can affect the spike proteins in one's bodies. The needles have mostly vitamin C in them with some vitamin A.

It would seem an excellent idea to consider getting into the tea business. The pine needles appear, out of all the conifers, to be the best for the evergreen tea.

Or maybe someone has a better idea to rid our bodies of these suspected spike proteins, assuming of course, that the peer report from Japan is correct.
 By bluejay

08/14/2021  3:55PM

‘Historic Win’:

CHD(Children's Health Defense) Wins Case Against FCC on Safety Guidelines for 5G and Wireless

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit court ruled the Federal Communications Commission failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Children's Health Defense Team
The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) won its historic case today against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a case challenging the agency’s decision not to review its 1996 health and safety guidelines regarding wireless-based technologies including 5G.

Join our press event Monday, Aug. 16 at 10 a.m. PT/1 p.m. ET. Register now:

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit published its decision Aug.13. The court ruled that the FCC failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology when it decided that its 1996 radiofrequency emission guidelines protect the public’s health.

The court’s judgment states:

“The case be remanded to the commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation…”

CHD Chairman and attorney on the case Robert F Kennedy, Jr. said:

“The court’s decision exposes the FCC and FDA as captive agencies that have abandoned their duty to protect public health in favor of a single-minded crusade to increase telecom industry profits.”

CHD’s case was consolidated with another similar case that was filed by the Environmental Health Trust. The organizations filed joint briefs in the case.

CHD’s lead attorney for the case, Scott McCollough, a telecommunication and administrative law attorney who represented the petitioners in the hearing, said:

“This is an historic win. The FCC will have to re-open the proceeding and for the first time meaningfully and responsibly confront the vast amount of scientific and medical evidence showing that current guidelines do not adequately protect health and the environment.

The court’s decision continued to say:

“…the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment…The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms.”

The petitioners in the case filed 11,000 pages of evidence of harm from 5G and wireless technology which the FCC ignored, including evidence of already existing widespread sickness.

Attorney Dafna Tachover, CHD’s director of 5G and Wireless Harms Project, who initiated and led the case for CHD, said:

“The FCC will finally have to recognize the immense suffering by the millions of people who have already been harmed by the FCC’s and FDA’s unprecedented failure to protect public health. Finally the truth is out. I am hopeful that following this decision, the FCC will do the right thing and halt any further deployment of 5G.”

The court ruling was a two-to-one panel decision. Judge Robert Wilkins wrote the majority opinion. Judge Patricia Millett joined him and Judge Karen Henderson, who presided over the panel, issued a dissent.

CHD President Mary Holland said:

“The U.S. Court of Appeals decision in CHD’s case against the FCC reaffirms my faith in the judiciary. In these chaotic days, courts can still hold out the hope for sober-minded decisions according to the rule of law. I eagerly await FCC action in compliance with the court’s ruling.”

This historic case was filed by CHD on Feb. 2, 2020. The case challenged the agency’s decision not to review its 25-year-old radio-frequency emissions (RF) guidelines which regulate the radiation emitted by wireless technology devices (such as cell phones and iPads) and infrastructure (cell towers, Wi-Fi and smart-meters), and to promulgate biologically and evidence-based guidelines that adequately protect public health.
 By bluejay

08/14/2021  3:39PM

Martin Armstrong

"What will the market do when they realize the vaccine are not the answer and there will never be a return to NORMAL without government admitting what they have been doing will NEVER work and was wrong."
 By bluejay

08/09/2021  2:54PM

Lawyer goes after school boards in Orange County for mandating shots for children with facts,

 By bluejay

08/05/2021  9:01AM

Relayed news from Martin Armstrong

In Alberta, Canada, Patrick King represented himself in court after being fined $1200 dollars for protesting against the Covid restrictions. He issued a subpoena to the Provincial Health Minister for proof that the Covid-19 Virus exists. The government was UNABLE or UNWILLING to provide that proof and were therefore forced to admit that they had no such evidence.

Check out what past undersecretary of the Treasury, Paul Craig Roberts, under Ronald Reagan has to say about all the money the big drug companies are making selling jabs to the world at usawatchdog.com.
 By bluejay

07/18/2021  8:42AM

From Children’s Health Defense News and Views,

Glyphosate(a pesticide) Still Used Everywhere Despite Evidence It Caused Cancer, Other Diseases.

Feedback comment from a reader,


Jacek R
3 days ago
Russia does NOT ALLOW GLYPHOSATE because of its many dangers. Yet America and its prostitute like Congress, along with its corrupt EPA, have allowed the lobbyists (bribers) to manipulate the law into having it declared safe, and allows it to be sold at thousands of lawn and garden centers, throughout the country.

Mexico plans to completely ban Glyphosate within a matter months. So as one comment to the main article stated, it will be safer to buy produce from Mexico after it is completely banned.

Our solution to this poisoning is grow our own and buy organic. Some prominent professionals state that the body’s process to eliminate toxins Is erroneously called bacterial and viral infections.
 By bluejay

07/04/2021  3:16PM

Words from the respected Martin Armstrong,

"Why are governments mandating vaccines or pushing them? Have they just been bribed? There is no independent review standing between the companies and the people. That is our greatest problem — TRUST. Meanwhile, Twitter bans anyone for even claiming a family member died from the vaccine. This is really getting out of hand. Twitter should be shut down as an agent of propaganda. How will we ever get the truth with all this political censorship?"
 By Michael Miller

06/26/2021  8:25PM

When I opened WORD, in order to draft a message, a multifaceted programmer took me down multiple unwanted paths. and my freedom of speech is distinguished.

A distinguished relevance is more than a phrase well known
to deep rock gold miners as "Deep Enough".

Do you know the relevance of the mining phrase, deep enough?
 By bluejay

06/26/2021  5:08PM

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448, 7 December 1996.

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.

This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.

This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiments should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

8.The experiments should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9.Duringthecourseoftheexperimentthehumansubjectshouldbeatlibertyto bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor's Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75

What international people or group of people have the guts to stand up to the servants of the globalists to stop the atrocity of their experimenting on the people of the World without their consent? In the time ahead of us, the euphemism of experimenting might be replaced by, the killing of.
 By bluejay

06/25/2021  3:25PM

Go to bitchute.com

Dr. Carrie Madej Goes FULL TRUTH on Jab, “There’s No Off Button”

Interview with Dr. Carrie Madej exposes the final plan of the globalists, mind and memory manipulation, the ability to “download” data and re-write the brain.

If you agree with the Globalists do nothing

If you think our immediate education is a necessity then pass along this video to your loved ones and friends.
 By bluejay

06/25/2021  2:43PM

The Globalists desire for their Great Reset has apparently started to influence our voted in representatives in supporting their agenda.

BUT, at whose expense?

Creator of mRNA Vaccine Technology Tells Tucker Carlson: "Government Not Being Transparent’ About Vaccine Risks."

Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 ]


© 2022 Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc.
PO Box 909
Alleghany, California 95910

(530) 287-3223      
(530) 287-3455

      Gold Sales:  

(530) 287-3540


Design & development by
L. Kenez